Feminist Disavowal Of Cissexism

I don’t think it’s much of a secret that feminism as a movement (and sometimes even as an ideology) has some troubles.

A movement plagued by prescriptive nonsense on a fairly regular basis, it has been guilty of body policing, life choice policing and attacking those women who choose options or exhibit traits that it deems to be part of the sexism aligned axis of kyriarchy. Thin women are attacked with body policing with catchphrases like, “real women have curves” and “eat a sandwich”. Women who choose to work in porn or in sex work are attacked in some really awful ways, as their self determination is stripped from them by the women who claim to protect the self determination of us all. (more…)

Rating 3.00 out of 5

This Is H.O.W. names new Executive Director

This Is H.O.W. NAMES New Executive Director

Phoenix, AZ, August 1, 2010:  The Board of Directors for This Is H.O.W., a 501c(3) charitable organization based in Phoenix that provides a transitional living environment for Trangender persons in crisis, has appointed Antonia “Toni” D’orsay as the new Executive Director of the organization and committed to expanding on the services it offers to transgender individuals in the Valley.

“I’m humbled by the honor, and committed to carrying This Is H.O.W.’s mission and the vision of its Founder, Regina Gazelle, forward through these troubled economic times. “  Ms. D’orsay said.

Founder and previous Executive Director Regina Gazelle, expressed support for Ms. D’orsay. “I have absolute faith in Toni,” she said. “She is my personal choice to succeed me, and brings an energy and passion that is matched only by her commitment to the community.”

Ms. Gazelle is moving on towards a new chapter in her life, having started and organized This Is H.O.W., and carrying if through the last four years.  “It’s time for me to move on, to see where else I can contribute.”

Founded in 2006 after ten years of struggle, This Is H.O.W. has assisted over 200 transgender individuals in the Valley with substance abuse and transitional living needs, filling a gap in a minority population that was noted for an unemployment rate twice that of the national average, and an underemployment rate nearly three times the national average in a recent study by the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF).

“The Phoenix Metropolitan area has an estimated population of 3,000 transgender individuals, “ Ms. D’orsay said. “ We need to do more, and I hope to make TIH the centerpiece of a wide ranging set of valleywide programs, in partnership with several other organizations in the valley.”

Ms. D’orsay herself is a graduate of This Is H.O.W., which saved her from homelessness. She has previously served as Assistant Director, Chair of the Board for the organization, and House Manager, during which time she helped to raise funds and improved overall operations.  For the last year she has been engaged in political advocacy work outside of the organization.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Rating 4.00 out of 5
With the Australian election heating up, with Labor now falling behind in some polls, with a distinct chance of a return to a Liberal Party government, with the outrahe about Australias first Woman Prime Minister, first Athiest Prime Minister choosing against same-sex marriage and with even first openly homosexual cabinet minister Penny Wong supporting the same-sex marriage ban decision and with Labor not even willing to commit to including sexuality and gender identity in their federalisation of Australian states diverse anti-discrimination laws it’s worth noticing that the Liberal Party won’t even agree not to use hate-based political ads!
 
TASMANIAN GAY AND LESBIAN RIGHTS GROUP
 
Media Release
Saturday July 31st 2010
LIBS FAIL TO SIGN ELECTION ANTI-HATE PLEDGE
DELANEY VOWS TO CHALLENGE ANY ELECTION HATE MATERIALS
For downloadable photos from pledge signing visit: 
The Liberal Party has again failed to sign a pledge against election hate, despite all other major parties and independents signing the pledge today at Salamanca Market in Hobart.
Today’s pledge signing was a response to election advertising authorised by the Liberal Party and members of the Exclusive Brethren during the 2006 state election, and the Liberal Party and Timber Communities Australia during the 2007 federal election, which vehemently attacked the human rights of gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex (GLBTI) people.
Human rights campaigner, Martine Delaney, who has challenged anti-GLBTI election material before the State Anti-Discrimination Tribunal, securing apologies from members of the Exclusive Brethren and from Timber Communities Australia, said the pledge is designed to set a higher standard for electioneering.
“By showing that a wide range of parties and independents oppose hatred in election campaigns I hope we can bring an end to the kind of electioneering that inflames prejudice against people who already have a hard enough time of it”, she said.
“The Liberal Party has never committed to signing the pledge, and it is deeply disappointing that this election will be no exception.”
“I profoundly hope there will be no material published during this election that hatefully attacks GLBTI people and our human rights, but if there is, I will challenge it before the Anti-Discrimination Tribunal just as I have in the past”, Ms Delaney said.
The Tasmanian Gay and Lesbian Rights Group’s anti-hate pledge was signed by Christine Milne for the Australian Greens, Jonathan Jackson for the ALP, Andrew Wilkie (Indep) and Mel Barnes for the Socialist Alliance. The Australian Democrats, who registered after the pledge was printed, signed a pledge which not only commits the party not to authourise hateful material but to enact stronger laws to combat incitement to hatred.
The Tasmanian Gay and Lesbian Rights Group’s anti-hate pledge was also a feature of 2007 federal election campaign in Tasmanian when it was also signed by all parties except the Liberal Party. 
The TGLRG will also conduct an election forum for the GLBTI community in Hobart on Tuesday evening at which all political parties will be represented including the Liberal Party.
Rating 3.00 out of 5
 

Cisgender Phasionista Phail

Reading the Transgender News today  I see yet another media PHAIL this time from Kelly Cutrone, owner of fashion PR firm People’s Revolution and star of the Bravo reality series “Kell on Earth.”   Apparently ABC News thinks she’s an authority on trans fashion modeling.  I guess they imagine any authority on the fashion industry would be expert when it comes to trans people.

So what does this person say about trans people in the fashion industry?

If there is one industry where people who are gay or different can express themselves, it’s the fashion industry,” Cutrone told ABCNews.com. “Fashion is a place for fantasy and illusion

Every now and then, as I’m reading through news stories and blogs, I come upon trans/homophobia that is so egregious that I just stop and, quite involuntarily, drop my jaw in amazement at the cluelessness or animosity that is being displayed.  This was one of them.  A real WTF moment.  The level of ignorance – if that’s what it was – or vile animosity if it wasn’t, is so blatant that it would be laughable if it weren’t so damned offensive.

Maybe it was ABC News that was taking her out of context.  It certainly isn’t the first time some lazy “news” reporter got stuff wrong now, is it?  Nevertheless once again we see the stigma of “fantasy and illusion,” of the idea that trans women are “really men” (something that really bugs me, as I’ve written before ) and are just out to deceive others for nefarious purposes, the most common lie being  the seduction of men into having homosexual relations  by pretending femininity while remaining male in reality.

It’s an obvious attempt to be certain Lea T remains gendered male, a perfect device to police her “real” gender.  We certainly can’t have a trans fashion model to be equal to the cis women in that industry!

Ms. Cutrone and ABC News won’t be getting a GLAAD letter about this anytime soon, of course.  It’s just an offhand remark in a story about a pre-op trans woman picked to be a fashion model, not a big deal for them, I’m sure.  I also doubt Ms. Cutrone will be reading this or any other blog that calls her on that comment either, unless of course, more than one voice is heard.  Can we get them to see the error?

Rating 3.50 out of 5
 

“We build ourselves prisons and live there, sometimes all of our lives.

We think we will be safe in them, but we just cut ourselves off from everyone else.”

Larissa

It’s my great good fortune to be employed in an environment which allows me to see and speak with some of the most remarkable human beings I imagine live on Planet Earth. They are nondescript, often poor and many times uneducated in the ways of suburban American lives.

Sometimes they are loud, often they see things I do not and can describe them in detail. Often their thoughts do not resonate with my experience, but the offering of them resonates within the speaker, sometimes to such a degree that no one else can speak to the thoughts presented.

The people I am fortunate enough to work among have that thing about them that most Americans fear, more so, I think, than most of us fear death. They have diagnoses. They have mental illness diagnoses.

Yes, the things we fear greatly: schizophrenia (often of the paranoid type,) schizoaffective disorder, severe bi-polar disorders, dysthymic disorders, acute glossalaliac mania, and depressive disorder. Many also have the lesser Axis II diagnoses that add a tremendous handicap to both themselves and the practitioners who work with them, the families who once (and occasionally still do) loved them (and sometimes contorted them into beings as brittle and delicate as funnel cakes,) and for those who live near them, interact with them and wish that they would just go away: borderline personality disorder, complex PTSD, anti-social personality disorder and the frightening to others dissociative identity disorder.

Some of those I work among are persistently at risk for self-harm, up to and including suicide. Very few and very rarely do they express a desire to harm others (no more so, anyhow, than the 10-million-times-a-day-said-by-most-children-and-many-adults-and-generally-not-considered-acutely-threatening “I wish you (him, her or they) would die” or a so-usual-as-to-be-not-noticed-in-the-suburbs “I’m gonna kill you (her, him or them.)”

Odd, no, how the addition of a diagnosis that scares the hell out of layman and professional alike (some if not all of those listed above) can make the mundane startlingly emergent, leading to calls for crisis clinicians and police officers, ambulances, psych-wards and state-owned psychiatric hospitals.

Ask politicians if scaring the bejesus out of the population isn’t an effective way to govern unhampered a supposed democratic republic. Better yet, ask yourself how many freedoms and tolerances are you willing to forego for the constitutional right to live forever regardless the fact of your own mortality.

“Larissa” (not, of course, even close to her real name) is one of those folks I am privileged to work among and with. She has one of those dreaded diagnoses so many of us perceive as nightmares on nights when we’ve over indulged in peanut-butter, dill pickle and bleu cheese with Alfredo sauce pumpernickel crust pizza chased by a 6-pack of PBRs.

Yeah, truly exquisite and torturous nightmares engulf us when we consider the possibility of a D-I-A-G-N-O-S-I-S. Frightening stuff, gimme a flaming pit in the deepest Puritan hell instead.

Yet, when one finds herself 21 years down the road working with such folks in one capacity or another, she finds that in most respects, hell, all respects on most days, she feels more safe and blessed to be among them than she feels herself to be among her suburban neighbors and acquaintances. There is no creature alive, I am certain, more liable to erratic, unhinged behavior than a suburbanite on a highway or road with an SUV or sedan.

No creature can be as unpredictably dangerous as the remnants of the disappeared white middle-class who profoundly believe that the ubiquitous relegation of a Puritan-based “Sinners in the hands of an” Angry God to fireside tales designed to frighten children has somehow managed to denigrate their supposed democracy to a plaything of “socialists and those people” who wish to enchain them in a subservience they grew up thinking was reserved to those of browner hue.

They decry their stolen wealth that they declare was taken by those who struggle to eat three meals a day and buy Pampers for their babies and in not admitting that they have been hoodwinked, bamboozled, relegated, stolen from, and demeaned by the very iconic paragons of America’s “wealth equates to righteousness and we do God’s work” financiers, corporate heads and minions, corporatist-Neolibs, Libertarians and -Neocons who they fervently dream will raise them to the level they believed they were born to. Those people are dangerous and frightening.

However, the fever dreams of the disappeared American middle-class and the cynical dictatorships of the wealthy and their minions in modern America aren’t the focus of the canvas I’m trying to paint in this essay.

The words attributed above in the epigraph to “Larissa” are the focus of that canvas. But, I know that her words bear as well on the “American problems” delineated above. We who make prisons for our selves live in the realm of our severe and persistent nightmares. We alienate ourselves from others and find our only friendships are among those who fear the same things as we fear: relationship, compassion, social consciousness and conscience. Afterall, the trope goes for the past three hundred years: God’s blessings are evidenced by the wealth and power he grants us, not by the good and decent works we do nor by finding that love and care are inexplicably among the few slivers of human existence that are both plentiful and free-of-charge.

I dance in your words. Appreciating your vulnerability. Surprisingly comfortable with my own. Your work is beautiful. Your journey is felt with passion and respect. Rest comfortably in yourself for you inspire me.”

Words from the Netz, graciously posted in comments here. I give her a curtsy in return and offer my hand, how else respond to such a gift?

In her words I dance, knowing full well what it costs to open just a tiny crack in a prison wall that’s built on years of torment and harm received. The common wisdom wraps us, as smooth and constricting as swaddling, or wrappings on the feet of classical Chinese women. It whispers through our limbs and alights while we sleep in our dreamscapes, you must be strong and alone to survive, else the demons will come again and ensnare you, begin the torture again.

Yet, what we know is true is that our dreams possess us even in daylight. Voices from the past flitter or shout through the bones we use to dance. Fear ripples through the muscle that moves the bones we dance with. Still, we maintain our notions of prisons, the safety that inheres inside the walls, closed away in dark cells where, if we are fortunate, the fears cannot find us.

Alas, no one is that fortunate for fear holds the keys to the prison and to the doors of every cell inside the thick, stone walls. He visits us when he cares to and we are helpless under his gaze and in his keeping.

The only avenue out is the avenue we most usually refuse to walk along. Avenue V that bears the initial of the keys to our unbearable, invisible prisons: vulnerability.

The truth is paradox. My hiding and fear never managed to release me from the prison of my being. The recognition and embrace of my vulnerability released me. Your recognition will release you as well. For, what are we if not inherently vulnerable? Who among us is unbreakable, immortal, needing have never a care for death, sorrow or pain?

Would all the secrets of a heart keep that heart from pain or sorrow, keep the brain that holds that fear from moving through the doorway into death? Thus, what is left, but to try the door that one fears most, but that one never tries at all?

In vulnerability lies the sacred  space we imagine lies beyond our deaths. In vulnerability and its acceptance for one’s self lies the fact of one’s inherent freedom: the freedom to be, to be one’s very self and take joy in that.

I know without a shade of doubt that the thought of others knowing I am a trans-woman, or knowing that I experienced a brutal rape once upon a time may lead to their removal from my life … out of fear. The fear that grips us in the places we feel most vulnerable: our sexuality, our acceptance and regard from others.

So it goes … and so it goes. On and on human being leads us into useless and groundless fears. We cower before differences in skin color, differences in our beliefs about deity or its non-existence (very like a religion itself, except that it refers to itself with a trope seldom used by the traditionally religious. Whisper now, rationality).

We hide the facts of our rapes, of our brutality toward others or their brutality toward ourselves. We hide, quiveringly, our transsexuality, our homosexuality, our compassion, our empathy, our love, our desire, our skin-color sometimes, our parents and siblings, our girlfriends or boyfriends, our intelligence, our joy. All of our virtue, we often feel, must remain hidden away and unreachable by those who would hurt us, by those we might love, or meet in friendship.

Is it wondrous, then, that the human world abounds with suffering, or that many think of life as “a vale of tears?”

How so? We hide away the best of ourselves, imagining that is the only way we can live long and without pain. Yet, death seeks us out, pain seeks us out, even in our hidden fortresses where fear holds the keys to the cells in which we immure ourselves.

Life hurts us. It’s a precondition of living. To be mortal and made of vulnerable material is to be inherently subject to pain. No amount of dissembling or whistling past graveyards changes that fact.

Fear holds the keys, and the keys are our various vulnerabilities. It’s only in reveling in vulnerability, risking pain and living in freedom from our unbearable, invisible prison walls, that we thrive. Only through acceptance of our vulnerability and through exultation in that vulnerability can we finally live in freedom, knowing others, loving them and laughing with them, crying together and holding one another in spite of ever-possible sorrow, ever-possible joy.

This post originally appeared at Life Journeys To A T

Rating 3.00 out of 5
Tagged with:
 

UPDATE: The date and time of the protest mentioned below has changed. From Andy Thayer at Pam’s House Blend,
The August 4th banquet that was to have led off AFTAH’s anti-gay “academy” has apparently been canceled. Therefore, our protest that was scheduled for that night has been moved to the following night at the site of the “academy”:

7:30 PM Sharp
Thursday, August 5th
In front of “Christian Liberty Academy”
502 W. Euclid Avenue, Arlington Heights, IL

For those traveling from Chicago, please meet in front of the Ogilvie Transportation Center Metra Station, 500 W. Madison Street, Chicago at 6 PM Sharp — just look for the Pride flag!

For more info, email or call the Gay Liberation Network at LGBTliberation@aol.com or 773.209.1187 (which is also day-of cell phone contact).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It seems the United States may slowly be turning around in its attitudes about gay and lesbian acceptance. Polls and popular media are all shifting to a more Gay/Lesbian friendly attitude, one that has the “religious” right wing homo haters rushing towards their fainting couches. Of course, the rhetoric from that group of propagandists has become more and more strident as their mendacious veneer of respectability wears thin and their obvious animosity becomes more and more apparent. They are getting more and more desperate, it seems, as their cash cow begins to run dry.

Some weeks ago, Peter Labarbera, from the “Americans for Truth about Homosexuality” hit upon a new scheme to separate his followers from their cash. He introduced an “Americans For Truth Academy” that, for a fee of course, would teach adults and kids as young as 14 how to engage in his brand of bigotry.

“Adults: $149 for 3-day conference; Single day rate: $50/day; Married couples discount: $199 for full conference; Youth: $99 (scholarships available to attendees ages 14-25)”

Two of the scheduled seminars in this laff fest are:

- Matt Barber, Liberty Counsel; Board Member, AFTAH: “Masculine Christianity: a non-defensive approach to the Culture War over homosexuality”

- Arthur Goldberg, JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality: “The gender confusion agenda: ‘transgender rights’”

First of all, I have to question how and where “masculine Christianity” is defined in the Bible, as opposed to “feminine Christianity.” Isn’t pretty much all of the Bible written by, for and generally about men? Calling his brand of Christianity “masculine” smacks of overcompensation and misogyny, two things that we are all too familiar with as motivations for hate crimes. In addition, what could “non-defensive” mean except “offensive?” The dog whistles are too loud in this workshop advertisement to ignore. I hope and pray the effect of its teaching doesn’t manifest itself into violence.  If, God forbid, violence is perpetrated by someone who has attended this seminar, I certainly hope accountability will be applied to the fullest.

After lunch on the second day, (“Light lunch provided” – for $50 per day they damn well better feed their “students.” I wonder what they will spike the Koolaid with this time?) we have Arthur Goldberg talking about,“The gender confusion agenda: ‘transgender rights.’” I was unfamiliar with Mr. Goldberg and his qualifications regarding his knowledge of trans people. AFTAH doesn’t have any biographical information on him, or any of the other presenters, other than the groups they are part of so I went a’searchin’.

It seems that Mr. Goldberg has little apparent knowledge, education or experience with trans people and their life experiences. The AFTAH website mentions that he’s the founder of JONAH, (Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality) a Jewish ex-gay ministry. It turns out he started this organization in 1999, after finishing his probation. What was he convicted of? Karen Ocamb tells us,

An investigation by Truth Wins Out, an antigay-watching site headed by longtime Religious Right watcher Wayne Besen and the South Florida Gay News revealed that Arthur Goldberg, co-foundeder of Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality (JONAH) and president of Positive Alternatives to Homosexuality (PATH), is also “Abba Dabba Do,” who the investigators say was “the Wall Street criminal mastermind who was convicted in 1987 and went to prison for ”fraud of spectacular scope” that included “bilking poor communities with complicated bond schemes.”

Wayne Besen, at Truth Wins Out tells us a bit more,

Upon completing his parole, Goldberg dropped his conspicuous middle name, Abba, and co-founded Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality (JONAH) in 1999. He is currently the president of Positive Alternatives to Homosexuality (PATH), an umbrella group for “ex-gay” referrals and the Executive Secretary of the notorious National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH). He is also the President of Congregation Mount Sinai, a temple in Jersey City and a Principal for the International Center for Gender Affirming Processes (CGAP). Goldberg is a key ex-gay industry insider and viewed as an architect of its strategy and message machine.

So it seems this guy is qualified to talk about trans people – as long as honesty and real knowledge aren’t required. Was J. Michael Bailey unavailable? At least he can claim to have done some research about trans people, even if it is just on a few that went to the same bars he did. Hmm, must be nice work if ya kin getit!

Peter Labarbera, calls the trans community, “the crazy cousin of the ‘gay’ movement.” I guess he figures we’re so incapacitated we won’t be able to recognize and call him on the brand of crap he’s peddling. A protest is being planned to take place outside the location of this farce on August 4th. We need a sizable part of that protest come from the trans community. More info can be found at this facebook page. I wish I could be there in body as well as in spirit.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
 

I am not Intersex (to my knowledge) but in the matter of basic bio-ethics and human rights these are not complex or difficult issues.

This post is prompted by this article http://www.healthcanal.com/surgery-rehabilitation/9595-Study-recommends-that-parents-physicians-share-decisions-sex-development-disorder-surgery.html but this is not the first time i have spoken on this issue.

It really is astonishingly simple. Children are not property. Property you can do whatever you want with. Children you cannot. You may have rights over property as an extension of yourself, but a child is not property.

A child is a person. A person in a state of effectively temporarily suspended personal responsibility. Like someone in a coma, someone who is drunk, someone otherwise not currently capable of making decisions for themselves you have a responsibility to their well being so that when they sober or wake up or are cured or grow old enough they can make their own choices. Hear that doctors? Parents?

You are obligated to ensure they can make those choices. You are obligated to their needs untill they can make their own choices. You cannot do whatever you want to them. You cannot have sex with the person in the coma, you cannot tattoo the person who is drunk. You cannot impose over them that they be how you would prefer they be or think they should want. If you think Susie would look better blonde you cannot dye her hair while she is sleeping. You aren’t there to impose your choices over them but to maximise their capacity to make choices for themselves and to maximise the choices they can make for themselves.

Those are their choices to make. And it doesn’t matter that they are presently unable to make those choices. You just have to look after them untill they are capable. So that they will be capable. You keep the comatose person fed intravenously, you hold the drunk persons hair out of the way while they vomit and be sure they don’t fall into the toilet and drown, you feed and clothe the child and ensure they get an education allowing them to make informed decisions.

This is really quite simple on a day to day basis. Now at times a decision must be made on behalf of someone who is your responsibility, in such an emergency it’s quite simple still, the decision you must prioritise is the one that maximises the latter choice of the person in your care.

So lets see how that works for childrens genitals. Well clearly you don’t have sex with children for starters.

 But if you are not having sex with your child, as i found myself explaining to one woman during the Australian Human Rights Community Consultation, then your preferance in appearance of a circumcised penis has no bearing. The mother does not know what the preferance in penis appearance of that childs future partners if any will be. It’s not her bussiness.

The child is totally capable when they grow up to decide whether they want to be circumcised or not. They do not need that decision made for them before they are equally able to make their own decisions about being sexually active.

Imagine if a parent wanted their child tattoo’d. What if that child didn’t like that tattoo when they grew up?

A child may obviously come to regret having their body changed to suit the tastes of their parent/s. A choice made for them when they couldn’t decide for themselves and which in an adult is no-one elses choice but their own. So thats wrong.

Even when such body modification is religious or cultural in origin an adult has the right to change religions, to embrace them, to abandon a culture or embrace it. And so a child should not be put through such body-modifications which they later in life may regret was done to them before they can make those choices for themselves. It’s simple and beyond that it’s concrete. Anything else is an abuse of that childs rights. A failure of the parents responsibility to their child as a free decision making autonomous individual. The child can always choose to undergo that ritual circumcision, scarification, tatttooing, or any other cultural or religious practice when they are old enough to do so of their own free will. A child is a person and not property.

And so we come to Intersex Infants. And by now i already have a water-tight case of what is right and what is wrong. That which maximises the childs adult choices = right. That which reduces them = wrong. So where for survivals sake a child needs surgery the minimum required is all that may ethically be done before the child is considered capable of deciding for itself. Thats it. Nothing else is ethical.

Elective surgery on Intersex Infants is not Ethical. It should be imediately banned. Made a serious crime in fact. Circumcision on infants too should be illegal, whether on females or males, and for the exact same reasons.

Your childrens genitals are not your property. A child is a person. And a doctors duties are not to a parents wishes or preferances but to the childs future options. Thats all there is to it.

And when you understand these basic principles it becomes clear that availability of hormone blockers to delay puberty for Transgender children are quite appropriate because that action maximises the childs own choice in exactly the same way that the innaction of not surgically altering an intersex person without their consent also maximises their choices.

So while one is action and the other inaction the very same Human Rights Principle requires of Parents and Doctors a clear course of action.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
 

Reposted from my personal blog, That’s What Ze Said.

There are so many things destructive to the trans community, but the one getting to me worst lately is the idea of the ideal or singular trans experience. By this, I mean the idea that there is one way to be trans and if you do not fit this model, you are an imposter/going through a phase/just plain not trans. I’ve seen this idea ranging from “you have to know you are trans as a child” to “you must want medical transition.” to whatever else this certain person believes is the litmus test for trans identity. And what really gets me is how much I have seen this internalized within the trans community itself. Sure, lots of cisfolk believe you must have some certain trait to really be trans, but a lot of transfolk believe this too. (more…)

Rating 4.00 out of 5

Wrong tactics? Rhetoric more needed than Reason?

The other day i listened to a radio interview about a study that seems dispiriting but which matches up with my observations of late. http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2010/s2960916.htm

That you can put totally perfect evidence on a platter literally under someone’s very nose and many will still disbelieve it if it doesn’t match what they already believe. Here’s the crux of the matter:

JASON REIFLER: Well we’re certainly susceptible to misinformation in that once we believe something that is wrong then it’s really difficult to correct people.

ELEANOR HALL: So we know that our ignorance about certain issues makes it easy for us to be misled but your research shows that we don’t necessarily change our minds even when we have the facts.

JASON REIFLER: Exactly. And it also shows that there’s an important difference between simply being ignorant and being misinformed, that is, believing that you know something but in fact being wrong.

And what we found is that in trying to correct people there are a number of defences that citizens might be able to bring to bear.

ELEANOR HALL: Your research looked at what you call the back-fire effect in relation to the Iraq War. What did you find?

JASON REIFLER: When we told people that the United States had not found weapons of mass destruction, conservatives, compared to conservatives that we didn’t correct actually believed more strongly that the US had found weapons of mass destruction.

So that by telling them that in fact the US didn’t and pointing to a CIA report known as the Duelfer report citizens actually, their response was, well actually now I believe it more strongly.

ELEANOR HALL: So not only did they not believe the facts that you were putting before them; they actually reinforced the incorrect views they originally had.

JASON REIFLER: Exactly.

ELEANOR HALL: So how do you explain that? Why do people become even more certain in their misperceptions?

JASON REIFLER: When you believe something about the political world or even about the non-political world and it’s really important to you, when you’re told that you’re wrong that can be a pretty threatening experience.

People don’t like being wrong. They have trouble adjusting to it and incorporating new information.

So taking all that in can we still change people’s minds? Why yes, it’s been done before. So it is possible. So what is it we need? What are we doing wrong?

I think the problem is we have been using reasoned, logical nueanced fact-based arguments. Just the sort of thing that reasoned people use to change their views, and i think we’ve won over all of them already. And that’s the problem. We haven’t reached a lot of others because thats not how they change their minds.

We need sound-bites, we need memes, we need emotive arguments, we need rhetoric, we need ways that say why people should support our equal rights that aim right at their most treasured pre-existing values and put their own beliefs into direct conflict with one another and force them to convince themselves.

We need to keep it all backed up with facts still, unlike those who use rhetoric against us, and how potent a tool it has been forthem that despite a mountain of evidence on our side we still get faced with the same empty lies over and over again. And when our Rhetoric is bound together with facts it will be far more potent. And it’s time we bring some Judo into this. Forget the ‘masters tools’ argument, it’s rot. We need to use our opponents own size weight and even momentum against them.

They have been falsely claiming the moral high ground, the religious ground, the family values, the personal liberty.. all of these are the opposite. We have the Ethical and Moral high ground, we have the religious liberty argument that is consistent, we have the care for families, we are the ones calling for personal liberty.

It’s time we put the art into our arguments. And speak to the heart of confused people. Show how our claims more closely match their deep-seated beliefs. And our opponents will cruble like ash before the wind when they realise they cannot keep up fighting with well-told lies when we can fight back with well-told truth.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
 

TransActive II: Expectations

I’m sometimes asked how people can advocate for the trans community, usually by apprehensive people who have visions of standing out in front of government buildings with picket signs shouting slogans, or sometimes by people who are whipping themselves up into an energetic frenzy so that they can be as boisterous as possible.  The truth is that that’s only one form of activism (a kind of last resort, really), and the larger picture is, well, more mundane.  That is not to say it’s easier, it can be very complex at times, but in the end it’s… well… a different kind of drama.

I want to be clear that I’m not wanting to push the Mercedes way of doing things, nor to make myself out to be a guru of some sort.  What I say here needs to be tempered with what your own experience and instincts tell you.  Readers’ experience levels will vary, but I discovered that as basic as some of these things seem, sometimes they still do have to be said.  For those starting out or debating about doing advocacy, I’m hoping this will help folks avoid stumbling out of the gate.

One of the first things one needs to do is assess their own expectations.  Most people realize they’re not going to get rich doing trans advocacy.  There are few paid positions anywhere doing this kind of work — most of your efforts will be of a volunteer nature, and you may need to draw from your day-job income to fund some of them.  Chances are, you’ll have (or need) a job and have (or want) a relationship too, so everything will be a balancing act.

(more after the fold)

(more…)

Rating 3.00 out of 5