This week in Seattle is Geek Week (August 13th-22nd), and part of this week’s events is a conference devoted to exploring privacy, technology, and access to information. I’m here to understand what’s going on now, trending topics, and how these movements in privacy affect the trans community.

We have a great need to protect the privacy of our information for a variety of  obvious reasons. Information is currency now, both literally and figuratively. In my mind, it would be beneficial for the trans community to understand this and not get left behind. We are making gains in the legal realm. I think this shows that we’re starting to take control of the words and concepts used to define us. The next step in this evolution is to broaden this out and make sure that we begin to control who profits from our lives and experiences.

I’ll have more as the conference goes on…

Lincoln

Rating 4.00 out of 5
Tagged with:
 

(Part three of a series on trans advocacy.  Part one spoke about changing the narrative used to describe trans people, and part two looked at expectations.)

In order to be an advocate for any group that you are not a member of and that you don’t have the intimate knowledge of from life experience, a person really has to understand the damage caused by the colonial mentality in order to start seeing where the boundaries are.

(more…)

Rating 3.50 out of 5
 
In Australia we have an interesting situation with our current election when recently on a GLBT(I?) radio program the Shadow Attorney General George Brandis promised more than the current government has on improving matters for GLB(T?I?) people by making a commitment to including Sexuality and Gender Identity (maybe, as the Shadow Attorney General counts that as part of Sexuality apparently, but will the legislation?) in federal anti-discrimination legislation. http://www.cpod.org.au/download.php?id=4336 and yet at 5.52 on he says when asked about the ‘Sex Files’ report they’ll have to ‘look carefully’ at the Australian Human Rights Comissions reccomendations even though the report in question had reccomendations far below the Yogyakarta Principles requirements and catered to only parts of the Intersex and Transgender communities needs and that in the most minimal way possible. And it seems that sex marker reassignment is scary for their policies on relationships.

In other words they can’t make it easier to get your documents fixed, to allow Intersex kids to define themselves, to throw out unneccessary sex markers on documents with all the harm they do in all facets of peoples lives because it may make it harder to prevent marriage equality? That does seem to be what he said.

And the reaction to the case that’s mentioned next of a Trans Man’s cyst being denied state medical coverage because he wasn’t classed as a woman anymore but the condition is classed as a womens condition is far from adequate.

Both major parties have ruled out marriage-equality.

Even though the Prime Minister is an unmarried Atheist and her party has a Lesbian Minister for Climate-change and a senator who is  in a relationship with a Trans-man they are so scared of the religious right in marginal electorates that they have said they only support marriage between “a man and a woman”, with the changes they made in recognising relationships they changed the laws that reduced the pensions of elderly and disabled and unemployed same-sex couples who of course previously have been paying the higher tax rates of singles.

The Labor party has promised to streamline the various states and territories anti-discrimination legislation but have not yet promised to include sexuality and gender identity and expression. So that the conservative ‘Liberal’ party have promised this is interesting.. ah but they can’t promise to do it in the first term of course.

Labor has promised funding to address the massive suicide rate of Gays, of Lesbians, of Bisexuals… but what about Transgender Australians who face an attempted suicide rate of 37%-40% far higher than that of GL or B Australians? And what about Intersex whom it seems no-one is even bothering to count? http://www.starobserver.com.au/news/2010/07/27/gillard-to-fund-gay-suicide-prevention/28743 and theres important stuff in the comments about the organisation Beyond Blue. Here’s OII on this http://oiiaustralia.com/australian-labor-action-tackle-suicide/ note the response they got from the government, where they give their reason the most at-risk groups were the ones left off a list of a project that’s meant to prioritise the most at-risk communities!

So it seems that while both major parties do want the votes of the Gay Lesbian and Bisexual community and are willing to compete for those votes it’s very different for Trans and Intersex. Whose lives they aren’t concerned with putting effort into saving let alone improving.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
 

This post is originally part of my blog Talk about Gay Racism, which you can find here.

Talk About Gay Racism

Monica’s blog, TransGriot, can be found here:

http://transgriot.blogspot.com

Monica Roberts is an amazing activist. One of the founders of the National Transgender Advocacy Coalition (NTAC), she’s been involved in making the world a better place for trans folks since 1998. An accomplished fiction and nonfiction writer, she focuses her writing and activism on increasing the visibility of trans people of color. She is one of four African American trans women to win the International Foundation for Gender Education’s Trinity Award, the highest honor that international organization bestows. Her blog, TransGriot, has been going strong since 2006, and is one of the main places I get my news about what’s going on in the world. I caught up with her on Facebook, and she was gracious enough to grant me a quick interview for TAGR.

Monica, thanks again for doing this. I read your blog regularly. What made you decide to start TransGriot?

I got fed up with the lack of diversity in the trans blogs at the time, the whitewashing of trans POC’s out of trans history and the ignoring of our accomplishments. That led to the January 1, 2006 birth of TransGriot.

Outside of your blog, are you writing anything else?

I have four novel manuscripts in various stages of development. All except one have African American trans characters, and I’m thinking about doing a nonfiction book as well.

How did it feel to win the IFGE Trinity Award in 2006?

I was actually shocked I won it. I have been one of the trans community’s harshest critics when it comes to diversity,race and race relations issues in addition to being one of its leading Human Rights Campaign skeptics, so I thought I’d never receive it. Happy to say I was wrong on that one.

Were you involved with IFGE prior to that?

I attended the 2000 IFGE convention to help present Dawn Wilson with her IFGE award. I also had a several year subscription in the late 90′s-early 2k’s to Tapestry (IFGE’s magazine) and contribute articles to it. From time to time I help with a double secret yearly project.

As a trans woman of African descent, who are your role models?

I have too many to list. I have different people I look to for different things and qualities. But the main characteristics of the people that I consider my personal role models are being strong, spiritual people who have social justice chops, unshakable ethics, intelligence, and leaders who aren’t afraid to piss people off..

It’s a well documented fact that trans people of color are nearly invisible in media representation of trans lives. What do you think is the most harmful aspect of that?

That transpeople of color have very few historical role models, and too many falsehoods, misconceptions, and faith based lies that we have to overcome as we do trans advocacy work in our communities.

What was the first activism project you ever worked on?

I took a trip to DC for the 1998 GenderPac Lobby Day.

You’re one of the founding members of NTAC. Are you still active with them?

I take part in their lobby days when I’m needed as Lobby Director Vice Chair emeritus.

When you were younger, what did you think you would be doing by this point in life?

I’m a political junkie, and when I wasn’t wrestling with the gender issues, dreamed about one day sitting on either the Houston City Council, in the Texas legislature or in Congress. It never occurred to me that I’d be considered a historical figure as a African descended trans activist and writer.

Who are some of the up and coming trans leaders you’ve got your eye on?

There are probably more than a few that haven’t popped up on my radar screen because they’re toiling locally or doing great work on college campuses. Peeps who I do have my eye are Cydne Kimbrough, who has been doing great work in Baltimore for decades. Brittany Novotny who is currently running for the Oklahoma legislature, Maria Roman in LA stepping up for trans Latinas, and Amanda Morgan in New York.

Internationally I like Naomi Fontanos, the current chair of STRAP (Society of Transsexual Women of the Philippines), Sass Rogando Sasot, Victor Mukasa in Uganda, Leona Lo in Singapore, and Audrey Mbugua in Kenya.

One who may be a surprise to you is Isis King. She has that potential if she wants it. She has the intelligence, the public speaking skills, the name recognition and the model quality looks to go with it.

This is great, Monica. Thanks for taking time out of your busy schedule to give me and my readers a chance to get to know you and find out more about your activism and your blog.

Rating 3.00 out of 5

BMH Responds To Transgender Conversation

8/4/2010

Muncie – As has been widely reported in various media, regarding a transgender woman involving her recent experience while seeking services at Ball Memorial Hospital, the patient’s account of what transpired during her visit concerns us deeply and gave us pause.

It prompted us to take action!  Ball Memorial Hospital (BMH) is engaging with Indiana Equality & Indiana Transgender Rights Advocacy Alliance to assist with review of BMH care policies, employee benefits, and diversity training.  BMH is collaborating with both groups to develop a curriculum for employee LGBT awareness training to improve sexual orientation and gender identity awareness in BMH anti-discrimination training.  This will include sensitivity to the sometimes special health care needs of people who are transgender.

Discussions also included Ball Memorial Hospital’s 2010 strategic plan to implement a Diversity Council that will include local community member participation that reflects the varied and diverse community served by our hospital.  The Council will be charged with the development of an inclusive diversity initiative that results in ensuring a culture of respect, trust and engagement.

Ball Memorial Hospital is committed to providing preeminent health care services for all our patients, and to continue its tradition of treating all patients and families with dignity and respect.

To all who have posted on our Facebook page, we thank you for your feedback!

Mike Haley
President & CEO
Ball Memorial Hospital

Rating 3.00 out of 5
Tagged with:
 

Feminist Disavowal Of Cissexism

I don’t think it’s much of a secret that feminism as a movement (and sometimes even as an ideology) has some troubles.

A movement plagued by prescriptive nonsense on a fairly regular basis, it has been guilty of body policing, life choice policing and attacking those women who choose options or exhibit traits that it deems to be part of the sexism aligned axis of kyriarchy. Thin women are attacked with body policing with catchphrases like, “real women have curves” and “eat a sandwich”. Women who choose to work in porn or in sex work are attacked in some really awful ways, as their self determination is stripped from them by the women who claim to protect the self determination of us all. (more…)

Rating 3.00 out of 5

“We build ourselves prisons and live there, sometimes all of our lives.

We think we will be safe in them, but we just cut ourselves off from everyone else.”

Larissa

It’s my great good fortune to be employed in an environment which allows me to see and speak with some of the most remarkable human beings I imagine live on Planet Earth. They are nondescript, often poor and many times uneducated in the ways of suburban American lives.

Sometimes they are loud, often they see things I do not and can describe them in detail. Often their thoughts do not resonate with my experience, but the offering of them resonates within the speaker, sometimes to such a degree that no one else can speak to the thoughts presented.

The people I am fortunate enough to work among have that thing about them that most Americans fear, more so, I think, than most of us fear death. They have diagnoses. They have mental illness diagnoses.

Yes, the things we fear greatly: schizophrenia (often of the paranoid type,) schizoaffective disorder, severe bi-polar disorders, dysthymic disorders, acute glossalaliac mania, and depressive disorder. Many also have the lesser Axis II diagnoses that add a tremendous handicap to both themselves and the practitioners who work with them, the families who once (and occasionally still do) loved them (and sometimes contorted them into beings as brittle and delicate as funnel cakes,) and for those who live near them, interact with them and wish that they would just go away: borderline personality disorder, complex PTSD, anti-social personality disorder and the frightening to others dissociative identity disorder.

Some of those I work among are persistently at risk for self-harm, up to and including suicide. Very few and very rarely do they express a desire to harm others (no more so, anyhow, than the 10-million-times-a-day-said-by-most-children-and-many-adults-and-generally-not-considered-acutely-threatening “I wish you (him, her or they) would die” or a so-usual-as-to-be-not-noticed-in-the-suburbs “I’m gonna kill you (her, him or them.)”

Odd, no, how the addition of a diagnosis that scares the hell out of layman and professional alike (some if not all of those listed above) can make the mundane startlingly emergent, leading to calls for crisis clinicians and police officers, ambulances, psych-wards and state-owned psychiatric hospitals.

Ask politicians if scaring the bejesus out of the population isn’t an effective way to govern unhampered a supposed democratic republic. Better yet, ask yourself how many freedoms and tolerances are you willing to forego for the constitutional right to live forever regardless the fact of your own mortality.

“Larissa” (not, of course, even close to her real name) is one of those folks I am privileged to work among and with. She has one of those dreaded diagnoses so many of us perceive as nightmares on nights when we’ve over indulged in peanut-butter, dill pickle and bleu cheese with Alfredo sauce pumpernickel crust pizza chased by a 6-pack of PBRs.

Yeah, truly exquisite and torturous nightmares engulf us when we consider the possibility of a D-I-A-G-N-O-S-I-S. Frightening stuff, gimme a flaming pit in the deepest Puritan hell instead.

Yet, when one finds herself 21 years down the road working with such folks in one capacity or another, she finds that in most respects, hell, all respects on most days, she feels more safe and blessed to be among them than she feels herself to be among her suburban neighbors and acquaintances. There is no creature alive, I am certain, more liable to erratic, unhinged behavior than a suburbanite on a highway or road with an SUV or sedan.

No creature can be as unpredictably dangerous as the remnants of the disappeared white middle-class who profoundly believe that the ubiquitous relegation of a Puritan-based “Sinners in the hands of an” Angry God to fireside tales designed to frighten children has somehow managed to denigrate their supposed democracy to a plaything of “socialists and those people” who wish to enchain them in a subservience they grew up thinking was reserved to those of browner hue.

They decry their stolen wealth that they declare was taken by those who struggle to eat three meals a day and buy Pampers for their babies and in not admitting that they have been hoodwinked, bamboozled, relegated, stolen from, and demeaned by the very iconic paragons of America’s “wealth equates to righteousness and we do God’s work” financiers, corporate heads and minions, corporatist-Neolibs, Libertarians and -Neocons who they fervently dream will raise them to the level they believed they were born to. Those people are dangerous and frightening.

However, the fever dreams of the disappeared American middle-class and the cynical dictatorships of the wealthy and their minions in modern America aren’t the focus of the canvas I’m trying to paint in this essay.

The words attributed above in the epigraph to “Larissa” are the focus of that canvas. But, I know that her words bear as well on the “American problems” delineated above. We who make prisons for our selves live in the realm of our severe and persistent nightmares. We alienate ourselves from others and find our only friendships are among those who fear the same things as we fear: relationship, compassion, social consciousness and conscience. Afterall, the trope goes for the past three hundred years: God’s blessings are evidenced by the wealth and power he grants us, not by the good and decent works we do nor by finding that love and care are inexplicably among the few slivers of human existence that are both plentiful and free-of-charge.

I dance in your words. Appreciating your vulnerability. Surprisingly comfortable with my own. Your work is beautiful. Your journey is felt with passion and respect. Rest comfortably in yourself for you inspire me.”

Words from the Netz, graciously posted in comments here. I give her a curtsy in return and offer my hand, how else respond to such a gift?

In her words I dance, knowing full well what it costs to open just a tiny crack in a prison wall that’s built on years of torment and harm received. The common wisdom wraps us, as smooth and constricting as swaddling, or wrappings on the feet of classical Chinese women. It whispers through our limbs and alights while we sleep in our dreamscapes, you must be strong and alone to survive, else the demons will come again and ensnare you, begin the torture again.

Yet, what we know is true is that our dreams possess us even in daylight. Voices from the past flitter or shout through the bones we use to dance. Fear ripples through the muscle that moves the bones we dance with. Still, we maintain our notions of prisons, the safety that inheres inside the walls, closed away in dark cells where, if we are fortunate, the fears cannot find us.

Alas, no one is that fortunate for fear holds the keys to the prison and to the doors of every cell inside the thick, stone walls. He visits us when he cares to and we are helpless under his gaze and in his keeping.

The only avenue out is the avenue we most usually refuse to walk along. Avenue V that bears the initial of the keys to our unbearable, invisible prisons: vulnerability.

The truth is paradox. My hiding and fear never managed to release me from the prison of my being. The recognition and embrace of my vulnerability released me. Your recognition will release you as well. For, what are we if not inherently vulnerable? Who among us is unbreakable, immortal, needing have never a care for death, sorrow or pain?

Would all the secrets of a heart keep that heart from pain or sorrow, keep the brain that holds that fear from moving through the doorway into death? Thus, what is left, but to try the door that one fears most, but that one never tries at all?

In vulnerability lies the sacred  space we imagine lies beyond our deaths. In vulnerability and its acceptance for one’s self lies the fact of one’s inherent freedom: the freedom to be, to be one’s very self and take joy in that.

I know without a shade of doubt that the thought of others knowing I am a trans-woman, or knowing that I experienced a brutal rape once upon a time may lead to their removal from my life … out of fear. The fear that grips us in the places we feel most vulnerable: our sexuality, our acceptance and regard from others.

So it goes … and so it goes. On and on human being leads us into useless and groundless fears. We cower before differences in skin color, differences in our beliefs about deity or its non-existence (very like a religion itself, except that it refers to itself with a trope seldom used by the traditionally religious. Whisper now, rationality).

We hide the facts of our rapes, of our brutality toward others or their brutality toward ourselves. We hide, quiveringly, our transsexuality, our homosexuality, our compassion, our empathy, our love, our desire, our skin-color sometimes, our parents and siblings, our girlfriends or boyfriends, our intelligence, our joy. All of our virtue, we often feel, must remain hidden away and unreachable by those who would hurt us, by those we might love, or meet in friendship.

Is it wondrous, then, that the human world abounds with suffering, or that many think of life as “a vale of tears?”

How so? We hide away the best of ourselves, imagining that is the only way we can live long and without pain. Yet, death seeks us out, pain seeks us out, even in our hidden fortresses where fear holds the keys to the cells in which we immure ourselves.

Life hurts us. It’s a precondition of living. To be mortal and made of vulnerable material is to be inherently subject to pain. No amount of dissembling or whistling past graveyards changes that fact.

Fear holds the keys, and the keys are our various vulnerabilities. It’s only in reveling in vulnerability, risking pain and living in freedom from our unbearable, invisible prison walls, that we thrive. Only through acceptance of our vulnerability and through exultation in that vulnerability can we finally live in freedom, knowing others, loving them and laughing with them, crying together and holding one another in spite of ever-possible sorrow, ever-possible joy.

This post originally appeared at Life Journeys To A T

Rating 3.00 out of 5
Tagged with:
 

Reposted from my personal blog, That’s What Ze Said.

There are so many things destructive to the trans community, but the one getting to me worst lately is the idea of the ideal or singular trans experience. By this, I mean the idea that there is one way to be trans and if you do not fit this model, you are an imposter/going through a phase/just plain not trans. I’ve seen this idea ranging from “you have to know you are trans as a child” to “you must want medical transition.” to whatever else this certain person believes is the litmus test for trans identity. And what really gets me is how much I have seen this internalized within the trans community itself. Sure, lots of cisfolk believe you must have some certain trait to really be trans, but a lot of transfolk believe this too. (more…)

Rating 4.00 out of 5

I’m sometimes asked how people can advocate for the trans community, usually by apprehensive people who have visions of standing out in front of government buildings with picket signs shouting slogans, or sometimes by people who are whipping themselves up into an energetic frenzy so that they can be as boisterous as possible.  The truth is that that’s only one form of activism (a kind of last resort, really), and the larger picture is, well, more mundane.  That is not to say it’s easier, it can be very complex at times, but in the end it’s… well… a different kind of drama.

I will get to a how-to, but want to discuss an important underpinning first, in this part.  This will also be one of the most basic yet invaluable things a person can do to be an advocate, without even having to be an “activist” in any way.  And in typical fashion, I’ll start in the most roundabout way possible, but with a point to it all.

(more after the jump)

(more…)

Rating 3.67 out of 5
 

monogamy, polyamory, whatever

Crossposted at That’s What Ze Said

So, I’m going to rant about a trend I find ridiculously annoying about some of the more radical spaces I’ve been in: the idea that polyamory is somehow the best relationship model out there and that any sort of monogamy is to be demonized. I find this sentiment annoying on about 10 different levels.

What annoys me most is that it is based entirely on theory and not on everyday experience. I don’t care what kind of relationship model you have going as long as it is healthy for those involved. Rather than basing the quality on the relationship on what sort it is, we should be looking at if it is good for those involved. The questions I ask when talking to friends about their relationships are not “Are you poly? Mono? Open?” etc. I want to know “Are you being supported? Are you supporting your partner? Do you communicate?” These questions seem far more important than anything else.

One argument I hear a lot is “But.. monogamy is the ideal. Therefore it should be questioned. Therefore it is bad.” Now, the first two sentences are completely legit. We should question our relationship ideals. But we should do the same with poly ones. Also, the idea that, that which is the ideal is automatically bad seems rather silly. Let’s apply this logic to sexuality. By this logic, heterosexuality should never happen. We should all choose to be queer, even if we are only interested in the “opposite” genders. Rather than be who we are, this logic would have straight people deny their own sexualities and adopt one that does not fit. As we see with compulsory heterosexuality, compulsory queerness is equally fail.

This argument also ignores the fact that poly can be equally problematic and playing into the same things being questioned in monogamous relationships. Being poly does not do away with possessiveness, jealousy, bad communication, unbalanced power dynamics, abuse, or any of the million other things that are fucked/go wrong in relationships. It is just another model of relationship, no better or worse than monogamy.

I often feel alienated from spaces because I am grey-asexual, demi-romantic. Dating is not a common reality for me. I will easily go 2 years single without batting an eye. The idea of having multiple love interests/partners at a time is just far fetched. When I do date, I really only want one partner. This is not simply because of my socialization. It is my sexuality. I see this issue as just another way that ace people are misunderstood and excluded from communities.

Now, in no way am I demonizing poly relationships either. My last relationship was poly and I really enjoyed it. My point is simply that a relationship should be healthy, regardless of how it has been set up. Let’s look at it like that, rather than upholding certain models as somehow inherently better than others.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
Tagged with: