Okay, so I started to leave this as a comment on my earlier post about privacy rights, and it quickly began to grow into a post all its own. Here we go:

I think one of the main reasons I wanted to start this conversation was to begin talking about how we, as a community, can take control of our information and how it gets disseminated across the wider cis culture and among ourselves.

I’m old enough *sigh/grin* to remember how long it took to grab back language and power from the talk show circuit. We have had to work hard to reorient how our lives are talked about, and in some ways are still suffering from that timeframe, even though in other ways it was good for visibility. Certain memes were born in those realms that, for good or bad, we have not been able to shake. One thing I think we should look at is how to start telling our stories online in ways that give us ownership instead of waiting until cis culture determines where and how we fit in online and then having to battle back.

Part of that may well include figuring out how to respect and carve out space for people who have to be stealth, but still need access to the larger community. The online world also gives us ways to provide leverage for voices that don’t get heard offline. Communities of color, people with disabilities, youth, elders…all of those intersections of the trans communities are starting to gather together. One of the responsibilities of those among us in leadership positions, I feel, will be getting a more firm grasp on the ins and outs of social media so we can insure a wide open cooperative space.

The development of cisgender serves as a good example of this. The community has grown this word, dialogued and even fought about it online. Now it’s become more user friendly in the offline world. Even I’ve started using it, and that’s pretty amazing. Two years ago, I had no use for it at all. These days, it rolls off my tongue and I actually understand it, instead of viewing it as some theoretical ivory tower stuff developed by rich trans folks with too much time on their hands. Our communities have dialogued with cis folks around this word, trying to do education. When necessary though, we have held our ground and simply let them know that whether they like the word or not, it levels the playing field and we’re going to keep using it. This type of conversation, and other discussion like jettisoning the terms “MTF/FTM”, are proof that our online world continues to evolve and effect our offline lives.

This is the kind of control of our information and stories that I’m hoping grows bigger quicker. Attending this conference was a mental quantum leap in online life for me. Even though I’m very far from a social media expert, I suddenly grasp a lot about how crucial mastering these tools are to our future.

Another thing I learned is that the people on the other side of our computers are still looking at all of this information we leave online every day as this great, amorphous mass they have barely begun to figure out how to mine. One of the lecturers pointed out that part of what is wrong is how companies are defining “non-personal” information. He used his own example. He actually read the user agreement on his Itunes. On page 35 of 37 (I couldn’t have done it), it talked about the “non-personal” information they would be allowed to gather from him if he agreed to this contract by clicking yes. It included:

Occupation, zip code, item serial number, and a couple of other data points I can’t remember.

Now, I’m not a data maven myself, but most of us realized that two or three of those data points in concert would easily give you the user. And if you started there, with some diligence other information could be obtained.

He decided not to click yes and allow this information to be gathered. Now there are features on his Itunes that he is not allowed to have access to. We discussed (via Twitter and actual “words-coming-out-of-our-faces” conversations) ideas about how to tilt information consent and sharing back toward end-user (us) control. Some of them were: creating simplified, one page user agreements, allowing end-users to manually enter in data they were willing to share, and more transparency about where the data would go.

I’m not going to start behaving like Chicken Little and hollering that they’re coming for our information. In fact, I didn’t even lock down my Facebook page until it got hacked a few months ago. Until then, I was a happy budding social media consumer. My phone and yahoo email were connected to FB, along with a few other things. When my account was hacked, I realized just how much of my life information was available through one entry point. It did startle me a bit.

If anyone is interested in looking at the Twitter feed from the conference, you can find it at #pii2010

Lincoln

Rating 3.00 out of 5
Tagged with:
 

Out, Open, Closed, and In

Sorry for the absence, folks — work is a bear, ya know?

Ok, so it’s actually fairly easy work, right now, and we just finished two very successful efforts, but there’s a huge pile of paperwork I need to gothrough, not to mention the effort involved in setting up my office and getting the meeting room set up and fixed up and all that assorted stuff.

In any case, it’s keeping me fingers to the keyboard more for “important stuff” than for me to express the thoughts I have.

I guess that means I’ll have to make sure they are good one, huh?

Well, let’s start off with one.  One that’s been bugging me for a while: the complex intricacies of trans exposure and the risks (or lack thereof) of each of them.

And, in my general way, it’s come down to six groupings.  Out, Open, Blended, Closed, In, and Stealth.

And the best part is that none of it has a damn thing to do with closets…

(more…)

Rating 4.00 out of 5

chasing and vulnerability

(previously published elsewhere, updated)

Here’s the thing: I feel I have spoken in a lot of detail here and elsewhere about what I think of fetishes around trans people and, y’know chasers. Personally I still think an imbalanced fetish where at the core of the fetish is systemic oppression–well, the privileged person in that dynamic should probably seek therapy. That’s my hardline response.  I frankly just think a lot of so-called ftm fetishizers are DOING IT WRONG.
Basically I think this is similar across gender on the cissexual side of things–I’ve had more experiences with cis men who claim this fetish or affinity than cis women but it tends to work remarkably similarly. If the message you are putting out is “I talk big but I still am seeing you as an easy, ugly woman”–THAT IS NOT AN “FTM FETISH”. That is a “I am so gross or impatient that no cis woman will have me and/or I am a sex addict and/or I am too cheap for a pro and/or my wife will be home in 15, do you have a car?” That has nothing to do with my being a trans male–it has much more to do with what you think of my self esteem, what you think my body is like, and what you assume I will allow you to do to me.
Honestly, I think a lot of cis abusers (under the guise of ‘trans chasing’) are given a safe haven among communities of trans people when these abusers are attractive in some way and represent the cis approval so many of use crave.  It’s a complicated critique and there is a lot of b.s. to tease out, especially around transphobia and cissexism and how to hold other trans people responsible when they are reinforcing cissexism without necessarily blaming them for cissexism.  Often also as in many other communities of oppressed people there is an understandable reluctance (and/or justifiable political resistance) towards involving the police when abuse happens, so the responsibility towards righting abusive situations falls on loose communities of people who can experience oppression on many axes and often have few resources (monetary, emotional, etc) to devote to just redress of abuse.
I’ve been the fly on the wall in conversations (mostly online) where a cis woman chaser of trans men will openly comment on exploiting the naivety of the freshly “out” trans man–a phrase I recall goes something like “picking the fruit young off the tree”.  While that does not necessarily indicate abuse, and in fact may be the preferable relationship style for some newly out trans men, I think at the very least attitudes around chasers being “harmless” can make it much harder for someone experiencing abuse to seek and receive support and to warn others in the community about a particular person.  Among trans men specifically there is an unstated rule that any cis man or woman dating us is going to get points just for doing so.  But we cannot be complacent around an idea that often cis “trans-chasing”, while benign perhaps to most reading this, is a huge cover for someone who wants to prey upon vulnerable people.

Rating 3.50 out of 5
Tagged with:
 

Privacy and Your Life: A Single Identity?

One of the themes I’m hearing over and over again is that we’re moving toward a single online identity. Information has begun to pile up closer and closer together. The Internet has been a point of learning and connection for the trans communities for years. We discover facets of our identities, find trans positive services, and those of us in more isolated areas connect with the larger community for support.

To me, the idea of our online identity’s solidifying has possible direct implications for the trans communities. We already know that human resources reps do Web searches on candidates, and the idea that we should “just not say anything we don’t want others to know” doesn’t necessarily hold water in our cases.

A lot of us use the Web for community building and information sharing. Here are just some of the ways I can think of:

  • Trans related blogs, especially from voices that don’t get air time in the mainstream LGB-T media
  • Compiling information about physicians, counselors, and other service providers who work with us
  • Rating those service providers
  • Putting out dates and times for conferences, support groups, and other community events.

What do you think about our lives, the role the Internet plays in growing our community, and protecting our information in this age where information is increasingly bought and sold without transparency? I see us as an untapped market, so part of the reason I’m asking is to start a conversation about how to guard and grow our information in the future.

Rating 4.33 out of 5
Tagged with:
 

This week in Seattle is Geek Week (August 13th-22nd), and part of this week’s events is a conference devoted to exploring privacy, technology, and access to information. I’m here to understand what’s going on now, trending topics, and how these movements in privacy affect the trans community.

We have a great need to protect the privacy of our information for a variety of  obvious reasons. Information is currency now, both literally and figuratively. In my mind, it would be beneficial for the trans community to understand this and not get left behind. We are making gains in the legal realm. I think this shows that we’re starting to take control of the words and concepts used to define us. The next step in this evolution is to broaden this out and make sure that we begin to control who profits from our lives and experiences.

I’ll have more as the conference goes on…

Lincoln

Rating 4.00 out of 5
Tagged with:
 

(Part three of a series on trans advocacy.  Part one spoke about changing the narrative used to describe trans people, and part two looked at expectations.)

In order to be an advocate for any group that you are not a member of and that you don’t have the intimate knowledge of from life experience, a person really has to understand the damage caused by the colonial mentality in order to start seeing where the boundaries are.

(more…)

Rating 3.50 out of 5
 

Inalienable Rights: Perry V Schwarzenegger

There is a lot of discussion going on about the recent decision in the Perry Vs. Schwarzenegger case, and the related issues surrounding it.

Let’s take a moment and look at some facts, some of the arguments being used, and the realities of Law in America.

One of the current memes being circulated with a lot of fervor is, in the law, literally without any basis or merit. This is the idea that Judge Walker’s sexual orientation (which Judge Walker has never publicly discussed, ever) has bearing on his decision.

If Judge Walker’s sexual orientation had a bearing on the case, then the sexual orientation of any judge who would rule on the issue will equally have bearing on the matter. Which means one would have to find someone without any sexual orientation (ergo, no gay, not straight, and not bisexual) to decide the case — and there are no publicly asexual judges currently sitting in the Northern Court that walker sits in.

People who use this argument are, therefore, essentially saying something that suggests that gay people are less than straight people — less trustworthy. This is established by the fact that if you mention the above to the people saying this, they say no, that’s not the case, a straight person wouldn’t benefit or be biased, when the basis of the argument most widely spoken against allowing gay people to marry is that they are “protecting traditional marriage” which would be, logically, a benefit to a straight person.

One cannot have it both ways, and so that shows a logical, reasonable failure of understanding, and demonstrates an irrational ideation that gay people are something to be avoided, or intensely disliked, or fearful of (in this case, the fear involved is that they will cause damage to the idea of traditional marriage).

When one is irrationally driven to aversion (avoiding, disgust), intense dislike (literally, hate), or fearful reaction to something, that’s called a phobia. IN this case, Homophobia, which makes the statement regarding Judge Walker homophobic.

Now, the statement being homophobic doesn’t mean the person is — they could, for example, merely be parroting the stuff said by the absolutely homophobic leadership of various organizations.

(more…)

Rating 3.33 out of 5

This Is H.O.W. names new Executive Director

This Is H.O.W. NAMES New Executive Director

Phoenix, AZ, August 1, 2010:  The Board of Directors for This Is H.O.W., a 501c(3) charitable organization based in Phoenix that provides a transitional living environment for Trangender persons in crisis, has appointed Antonia “Toni” D’orsay as the new Executive Director of the organization and committed to expanding on the services it offers to transgender individuals in the Valley.

“I’m humbled by the honor, and committed to carrying This Is H.O.W.’s mission and the vision of its Founder, Regina Gazelle, forward through these troubled economic times. “  Ms. D’orsay said.

Founder and previous Executive Director Regina Gazelle, expressed support for Ms. D’orsay. “I have absolute faith in Toni,” she said. “She is my personal choice to succeed me, and brings an energy and passion that is matched only by her commitment to the community.”

Ms. Gazelle is moving on towards a new chapter in her life, having started and organized This Is H.O.W., and carrying if through the last four years.  “It’s time for me to move on, to see where else I can contribute.”

Founded in 2006 after ten years of struggle, This Is H.O.W. has assisted over 200 transgender individuals in the Valley with substance abuse and transitional living needs, filling a gap in a minority population that was noted for an unemployment rate twice that of the national average, and an underemployment rate nearly three times the national average in a recent study by the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF).

“The Phoenix Metropolitan area has an estimated population of 3,000 transgender individuals, “ Ms. D’orsay said. “ We need to do more, and I hope to make TIH the centerpiece of a wide ranging set of valleywide programs, in partnership with several other organizations in the valley.”

Ms. D’orsay herself is a graduate of This Is H.O.W., which saved her from homelessness. She has previously served as Assistant Director, Chair of the Board for the organization, and House Manager, during which time she helped to raise funds and improved overall operations.  For the last year she has been engaged in political advocacy work outside of the organization.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Rating 4.00 out of 5

“We build ourselves prisons and live there, sometimes all of our lives.

We think we will be safe in them, but we just cut ourselves off from everyone else.”

Larissa

It’s my great good fortune to be employed in an environment which allows me to see and speak with some of the most remarkable human beings I imagine live on Planet Earth. They are nondescript, often poor and many times uneducated in the ways of suburban American lives.

Sometimes they are loud, often they see things I do not and can describe them in detail. Often their thoughts do not resonate with my experience, but the offering of them resonates within the speaker, sometimes to such a degree that no one else can speak to the thoughts presented.

The people I am fortunate enough to work among have that thing about them that most Americans fear, more so, I think, than most of us fear death. They have diagnoses. They have mental illness diagnoses.

Yes, the things we fear greatly: schizophrenia (often of the paranoid type,) schizoaffective disorder, severe bi-polar disorders, dysthymic disorders, acute glossalaliac mania, and depressive disorder. Many also have the lesser Axis II diagnoses that add a tremendous handicap to both themselves and the practitioners who work with them, the families who once (and occasionally still do) loved them (and sometimes contorted them into beings as brittle and delicate as funnel cakes,) and for those who live near them, interact with them and wish that they would just go away: borderline personality disorder, complex PTSD, anti-social personality disorder and the frightening to others dissociative identity disorder.

Some of those I work among are persistently at risk for self-harm, up to and including suicide. Very few and very rarely do they express a desire to harm others (no more so, anyhow, than the 10-million-times-a-day-said-by-most-children-and-many-adults-and-generally-not-considered-acutely-threatening “I wish you (him, her or they) would die” or a so-usual-as-to-be-not-noticed-in-the-suburbs “I’m gonna kill you (her, him or them.)”

Odd, no, how the addition of a diagnosis that scares the hell out of layman and professional alike (some if not all of those listed above) can make the mundane startlingly emergent, leading to calls for crisis clinicians and police officers, ambulances, psych-wards and state-owned psychiatric hospitals.

Ask politicians if scaring the bejesus out of the population isn’t an effective way to govern unhampered a supposed democratic republic. Better yet, ask yourself how many freedoms and tolerances are you willing to forego for the constitutional right to live forever regardless the fact of your own mortality.

“Larissa” (not, of course, even close to her real name) is one of those folks I am privileged to work among and with. She has one of those dreaded diagnoses so many of us perceive as nightmares on nights when we’ve over indulged in peanut-butter, dill pickle and bleu cheese with Alfredo sauce pumpernickel crust pizza chased by a 6-pack of PBRs.

Yeah, truly exquisite and torturous nightmares engulf us when we consider the possibility of a D-I-A-G-N-O-S-I-S. Frightening stuff, gimme a flaming pit in the deepest Puritan hell instead.

Yet, when one finds herself 21 years down the road working with such folks in one capacity or another, she finds that in most respects, hell, all respects on most days, she feels more safe and blessed to be among them than she feels herself to be among her suburban neighbors and acquaintances. There is no creature alive, I am certain, more liable to erratic, unhinged behavior than a suburbanite on a highway or road with an SUV or sedan.

No creature can be as unpredictably dangerous as the remnants of the disappeared white middle-class who profoundly believe that the ubiquitous relegation of a Puritan-based “Sinners in the hands of an” Angry God to fireside tales designed to frighten children has somehow managed to denigrate their supposed democracy to a plaything of “socialists and those people” who wish to enchain them in a subservience they grew up thinking was reserved to those of browner hue.

They decry their stolen wealth that they declare was taken by those who struggle to eat three meals a day and buy Pampers for their babies and in not admitting that they have been hoodwinked, bamboozled, relegated, stolen from, and demeaned by the very iconic paragons of America’s “wealth equates to righteousness and we do God’s work” financiers, corporate heads and minions, corporatist-Neolibs, Libertarians and -Neocons who they fervently dream will raise them to the level they believed they were born to. Those people are dangerous and frightening.

However, the fever dreams of the disappeared American middle-class and the cynical dictatorships of the wealthy and their minions in modern America aren’t the focus of the canvas I’m trying to paint in this essay.

The words attributed above in the epigraph to “Larissa” are the focus of that canvas. But, I know that her words bear as well on the “American problems” delineated above. We who make prisons for our selves live in the realm of our severe and persistent nightmares. We alienate ourselves from others and find our only friendships are among those who fear the same things as we fear: relationship, compassion, social consciousness and conscience. Afterall, the trope goes for the past three hundred years: God’s blessings are evidenced by the wealth and power he grants us, not by the good and decent works we do nor by finding that love and care are inexplicably among the few slivers of human existence that are both plentiful and free-of-charge.

I dance in your words. Appreciating your vulnerability. Surprisingly comfortable with my own. Your work is beautiful. Your journey is felt with passion and respect. Rest comfortably in yourself for you inspire me.”

Words from the Netz, graciously posted in comments here. I give her a curtsy in return and offer my hand, how else respond to such a gift?

In her words I dance, knowing full well what it costs to open just a tiny crack in a prison wall that’s built on years of torment and harm received. The common wisdom wraps us, as smooth and constricting as swaddling, or wrappings on the feet of classical Chinese women. It whispers through our limbs and alights while we sleep in our dreamscapes, you must be strong and alone to survive, else the demons will come again and ensnare you, begin the torture again.

Yet, what we know is true is that our dreams possess us even in daylight. Voices from the past flitter or shout through the bones we use to dance. Fear ripples through the muscle that moves the bones we dance with. Still, we maintain our notions of prisons, the safety that inheres inside the walls, closed away in dark cells where, if we are fortunate, the fears cannot find us.

Alas, no one is that fortunate for fear holds the keys to the prison and to the doors of every cell inside the thick, stone walls. He visits us when he cares to and we are helpless under his gaze and in his keeping.

The only avenue out is the avenue we most usually refuse to walk along. Avenue V that bears the initial of the keys to our unbearable, invisible prisons: vulnerability.

The truth is paradox. My hiding and fear never managed to release me from the prison of my being. The recognition and embrace of my vulnerability released me. Your recognition will release you as well. For, what are we if not inherently vulnerable? Who among us is unbreakable, immortal, needing have never a care for death, sorrow or pain?

Would all the secrets of a heart keep that heart from pain or sorrow, keep the brain that holds that fear from moving through the doorway into death? Thus, what is left, but to try the door that one fears most, but that one never tries at all?

In vulnerability lies the sacred  space we imagine lies beyond our deaths. In vulnerability and its acceptance for one’s self lies the fact of one’s inherent freedom: the freedom to be, to be one’s very self and take joy in that.

I know without a shade of doubt that the thought of others knowing I am a trans-woman, or knowing that I experienced a brutal rape once upon a time may lead to their removal from my life … out of fear. The fear that grips us in the places we feel most vulnerable: our sexuality, our acceptance and regard from others.

So it goes … and so it goes. On and on human being leads us into useless and groundless fears. We cower before differences in skin color, differences in our beliefs about deity or its non-existence (very like a religion itself, except that it refers to itself with a trope seldom used by the traditionally religious. Whisper now, rationality).

We hide the facts of our rapes, of our brutality toward others or their brutality toward ourselves. We hide, quiveringly, our transsexuality, our homosexuality, our compassion, our empathy, our love, our desire, our skin-color sometimes, our parents and siblings, our girlfriends or boyfriends, our intelligence, our joy. All of our virtue, we often feel, must remain hidden away and unreachable by those who would hurt us, by those we might love, or meet in friendship.

Is it wondrous, then, that the human world abounds with suffering, or that many think of life as “a vale of tears?”

How so? We hide away the best of ourselves, imagining that is the only way we can live long and without pain. Yet, death seeks us out, pain seeks us out, even in our hidden fortresses where fear holds the keys to the cells in which we immure ourselves.

Life hurts us. It’s a precondition of living. To be mortal and made of vulnerable material is to be inherently subject to pain. No amount of dissembling or whistling past graveyards changes that fact.

Fear holds the keys, and the keys are our various vulnerabilities. It’s only in reveling in vulnerability, risking pain and living in freedom from our unbearable, invisible prison walls, that we thrive. Only through acceptance of our vulnerability and through exultation in that vulnerability can we finally live in freedom, knowing others, loving them and laughing with them, crying together and holding one another in spite of ever-possible sorrow, ever-possible joy.

This post originally appeared at Life Journeys To A T

Rating 3.00 out of 5
Tagged with:
 

UPDATE: The date and time of the protest mentioned below has changed. From Andy Thayer at Pam’s House Blend,
The August 4th banquet that was to have led off AFTAH’s anti-gay “academy” has apparently been canceled. Therefore, our protest that was scheduled for that night has been moved to the following night at the site of the “academy”:

7:30 PM Sharp
Thursday, August 5th
In front of “Christian Liberty Academy”
502 W. Euclid Avenue, Arlington Heights, IL

For those traveling from Chicago, please meet in front of the Ogilvie Transportation Center Metra Station, 500 W. Madison Street, Chicago at 6 PM Sharp — just look for the Pride flag!

For more info, email or call the Gay Liberation Network at LGBTliberation@aol.com or 773.209.1187 (which is also day-of cell phone contact).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It seems the United States may slowly be turning around in its attitudes about gay and lesbian acceptance. Polls and popular media are all shifting to a more Gay/Lesbian friendly attitude, one that has the “religious” right wing homo haters rushing towards their fainting couches. Of course, the rhetoric from that group of propagandists has become more and more strident as their mendacious veneer of respectability wears thin and their obvious animosity becomes more and more apparent. They are getting more and more desperate, it seems, as their cash cow begins to run dry.

Some weeks ago, Peter Labarbera, from the “Americans for Truth about Homosexuality” hit upon a new scheme to separate his followers from their cash. He introduced an “Americans For Truth Academy” that, for a fee of course, would teach adults and kids as young as 14 how to engage in his brand of bigotry.

“Adults: $149 for 3-day conference; Single day rate: $50/day; Married couples discount: $199 for full conference; Youth: $99 (scholarships available to attendees ages 14-25)”

Two of the scheduled seminars in this laff fest are:

- Matt Barber, Liberty Counsel; Board Member, AFTAH: “Masculine Christianity: a non-defensive approach to the Culture War over homosexuality”

- Arthur Goldberg, JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality: “The gender confusion agenda: ‘transgender rights’”

First of all, I have to question how and where “masculine Christianity” is defined in the Bible, as opposed to “feminine Christianity.” Isn’t pretty much all of the Bible written by, for and generally about men? Calling his brand of Christianity “masculine” smacks of overcompensation and misogyny, two things that we are all too familiar with as motivations for hate crimes. In addition, what could “non-defensive” mean except “offensive?” The dog whistles are too loud in this workshop advertisement to ignore. I hope and pray the effect of its teaching doesn’t manifest itself into violence.  If, God forbid, violence is perpetrated by someone who has attended this seminar, I certainly hope accountability will be applied to the fullest.

After lunch on the second day, (“Light lunch provided” – for $50 per day they damn well better feed their “students.” I wonder what they will spike the Koolaid with this time?) we have Arthur Goldberg talking about,“The gender confusion agenda: ‘transgender rights.’” I was unfamiliar with Mr. Goldberg and his qualifications regarding his knowledge of trans people. AFTAH doesn’t have any biographical information on him, or any of the other presenters, other than the groups they are part of so I went a’searchin’.

It seems that Mr. Goldberg has little apparent knowledge, education or experience with trans people and their life experiences. The AFTAH website mentions that he’s the founder of JONAH, (Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality) a Jewish ex-gay ministry. It turns out he started this organization in 1999, after finishing his probation. What was he convicted of? Karen Ocamb tells us,

An investigation by Truth Wins Out, an antigay-watching site headed by longtime Religious Right watcher Wayne Besen and the South Florida Gay News revealed that Arthur Goldberg, co-foundeder of Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality (JONAH) and president of Positive Alternatives to Homosexuality (PATH), is also “Abba Dabba Do,” who the investigators say was “the Wall Street criminal mastermind who was convicted in 1987 and went to prison for ”fraud of spectacular scope” that included “bilking poor communities with complicated bond schemes.”

Wayne Besen, at Truth Wins Out tells us a bit more,

Upon completing his parole, Goldberg dropped his conspicuous middle name, Abba, and co-founded Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality (JONAH) in 1999. He is currently the president of Positive Alternatives to Homosexuality (PATH), an umbrella group for “ex-gay” referrals and the Executive Secretary of the notorious National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH). He is also the President of Congregation Mount Sinai, a temple in Jersey City and a Principal for the International Center for Gender Affirming Processes (CGAP). Goldberg is a key ex-gay industry insider and viewed as an architect of its strategy and message machine.

So it seems this guy is qualified to talk about trans people – as long as honesty and real knowledge aren’t required. Was J. Michael Bailey unavailable? At least he can claim to have done some research about trans people, even if it is just on a few that went to the same bars he did. Hmm, must be nice work if ya kin getit!

Peter Labarbera, calls the trans community, “the crazy cousin of the ‘gay’ movement.” I guess he figures we’re so incapacitated we won’t be able to recognize and call him on the brand of crap he’s peddling. A protest is being planned to take place outside the location of this farce on August 4th. We need a sizable part of that protest come from the trans community. More info can be found at this facebook page. I wish I could be there in body as well as in spirit.

Rating 3.00 out of 5