“We build ourselves prisons and live there, sometimes all of our lives.

We think we will be safe in them, but we just cut ourselves off from everyone else.”

Larissa

It’s my great good fortune to be employed in an environment which allows me to see and speak with some of the most remarkable human beings I imagine live on Planet Earth. They are nondescript, often poor and many times uneducated in the ways of suburban American lives.

Sometimes they are loud, often they see things I do not and can describe them in detail. Often their thoughts do not resonate with my experience, but the offering of them resonates within the speaker, sometimes to such a degree that no one else can speak to the thoughts presented.

The people I am fortunate enough to work among have that thing about them that most Americans fear, more so, I think, than most of us fear death. They have diagnoses. They have mental illness diagnoses.

Yes, the things we fear greatly: schizophrenia (often of the paranoid type,) schizoaffective disorder, severe bi-polar disorders, dysthymic disorders, acute glossalaliac mania, and depressive disorder. Many also have the lesser Axis II diagnoses that add a tremendous handicap to both themselves and the practitioners who work with them, the families who once (and occasionally still do) loved them (and sometimes contorted them into beings as brittle and delicate as funnel cakes,) and for those who live near them, interact with them and wish that they would just go away: borderline personality disorder, complex PTSD, anti-social personality disorder and the frightening to others dissociative identity disorder.

Some of those I work among are persistently at risk for self-harm, up to and including suicide. Very few and very rarely do they express a desire to harm others (no more so, anyhow, than the 10-million-times-a-day-said-by-most-children-and-many-adults-and-generally-not-considered-acutely-threatening “I wish you (him, her or they) would die” or a so-usual-as-to-be-not-noticed-in-the-suburbs “I’m gonna kill you (her, him or them.)”

Odd, no, how the addition of a diagnosis that scares the hell out of layman and professional alike (some if not all of those listed above) can make the mundane startlingly emergent, leading to calls for crisis clinicians and police officers, ambulances, psych-wards and state-owned psychiatric hospitals.

Ask politicians if scaring the bejesus out of the population isn’t an effective way to govern unhampered a supposed democratic republic. Better yet, ask yourself how many freedoms and tolerances are you willing to forego for the constitutional right to live forever regardless the fact of your own mortality.

“Larissa” (not, of course, even close to her real name) is one of those folks I am privileged to work among and with. She has one of those dreaded diagnoses so many of us perceive as nightmares on nights when we’ve over indulged in peanut-butter, dill pickle and bleu cheese with Alfredo sauce pumpernickel crust pizza chased by a 6-pack of PBRs.

Yeah, truly exquisite and torturous nightmares engulf us when we consider the possibility of a D-I-A-G-N-O-S-I-S. Frightening stuff, gimme a flaming pit in the deepest Puritan hell instead.

Yet, when one finds herself 21 years down the road working with such folks in one capacity or another, she finds that in most respects, hell, all respects on most days, she feels more safe and blessed to be among them than she feels herself to be among her suburban neighbors and acquaintances. There is no creature alive, I am certain, more liable to erratic, unhinged behavior than a suburbanite on a highway or road with an SUV or sedan.

No creature can be as unpredictably dangerous as the remnants of the disappeared white middle-class who profoundly believe that the ubiquitous relegation of a Puritan-based “Sinners in the hands of an” Angry God to fireside tales designed to frighten children has somehow managed to denigrate their supposed democracy to a plaything of “socialists and those people” who wish to enchain them in a subservience they grew up thinking was reserved to those of browner hue.

They decry their stolen wealth that they declare was taken by those who struggle to eat three meals a day and buy Pampers for their babies and in not admitting that they have been hoodwinked, bamboozled, relegated, stolen from, and demeaned by the very iconic paragons of America’s “wealth equates to righteousness and we do God’s work” financiers, corporate heads and minions, corporatist-Neolibs, Libertarians and -Neocons who they fervently dream will raise them to the level they believed they were born to. Those people are dangerous and frightening.

However, the fever dreams of the disappeared American middle-class and the cynical dictatorships of the wealthy and their minions in modern America aren’t the focus of the canvas I’m trying to paint in this essay.

The words attributed above in the epigraph to “Larissa” are the focus of that canvas. But, I know that her words bear as well on the “American problems” delineated above. We who make prisons for our selves live in the realm of our severe and persistent nightmares. We alienate ourselves from others and find our only friendships are among those who fear the same things as we fear: relationship, compassion, social consciousness and conscience. Afterall, the trope goes for the past three hundred years: God’s blessings are evidenced by the wealth and power he grants us, not by the good and decent works we do nor by finding that love and care are inexplicably among the few slivers of human existence that are both plentiful and free-of-charge.

I dance in your words. Appreciating your vulnerability. Surprisingly comfortable with my own. Your work is beautiful. Your journey is felt with passion and respect. Rest comfortably in yourself for you inspire me.”

Words from the Netz, graciously posted in comments here. I give her a curtsy in return and offer my hand, how else respond to such a gift?

In her words I dance, knowing full well what it costs to open just a tiny crack in a prison wall that’s built on years of torment and harm received. The common wisdom wraps us, as smooth and constricting as swaddling, or wrappings on the feet of classical Chinese women. It whispers through our limbs and alights while we sleep in our dreamscapes, you must be strong and alone to survive, else the demons will come again and ensnare you, begin the torture again.

Yet, what we know is true is that our dreams possess us even in daylight. Voices from the past flitter or shout through the bones we use to dance. Fear ripples through the muscle that moves the bones we dance with. Still, we maintain our notions of prisons, the safety that inheres inside the walls, closed away in dark cells where, if we are fortunate, the fears cannot find us.

Alas, no one is that fortunate for fear holds the keys to the prison and to the doors of every cell inside the thick, stone walls. He visits us when he cares to and we are helpless under his gaze and in his keeping.

The only avenue out is the avenue we most usually refuse to walk along. Avenue V that bears the initial of the keys to our unbearable, invisible prisons: vulnerability.

The truth is paradox. My hiding and fear never managed to release me from the prison of my being. The recognition and embrace of my vulnerability released me. Your recognition will release you as well. For, what are we if not inherently vulnerable? Who among us is unbreakable, immortal, needing have never a care for death, sorrow or pain?

Would all the secrets of a heart keep that heart from pain or sorrow, keep the brain that holds that fear from moving through the doorway into death? Thus, what is left, but to try the door that one fears most, but that one never tries at all?

In vulnerability lies the sacred  space we imagine lies beyond our deaths. In vulnerability and its acceptance for one’s self lies the fact of one’s inherent freedom: the freedom to be, to be one’s very self and take joy in that.

I know without a shade of doubt that the thought of others knowing I am a trans-woman, or knowing that I experienced a brutal rape once upon a time may lead to their removal from my life … out of fear. The fear that grips us in the places we feel most vulnerable: our sexuality, our acceptance and regard from others.

So it goes … and so it goes. On and on human being leads us into useless and groundless fears. We cower before differences in skin color, differences in our beliefs about deity or its non-existence (very like a religion itself, except that it refers to itself with a trope seldom used by the traditionally religious. Whisper now, rationality).

We hide the facts of our rapes, of our brutality toward others or their brutality toward ourselves. We hide, quiveringly, our transsexuality, our homosexuality, our compassion, our empathy, our love, our desire, our skin-color sometimes, our parents and siblings, our girlfriends or boyfriends, our intelligence, our joy. All of our virtue, we often feel, must remain hidden away and unreachable by those who would hurt us, by those we might love, or meet in friendship.

Is it wondrous, then, that the human world abounds with suffering, or that many think of life as “a vale of tears?”

How so? We hide away the best of ourselves, imagining that is the only way we can live long and without pain. Yet, death seeks us out, pain seeks us out, even in our hidden fortresses where fear holds the keys to the cells in which we immure ourselves.

Life hurts us. It’s a precondition of living. To be mortal and made of vulnerable material is to be inherently subject to pain. No amount of dissembling or whistling past graveyards changes that fact.

Fear holds the keys, and the keys are our various vulnerabilities. It’s only in reveling in vulnerability, risking pain and living in freedom from our unbearable, invisible prison walls, that we thrive. Only through acceptance of our vulnerability and through exultation in that vulnerability can we finally live in freedom, knowing others, loving them and laughing with them, crying together and holding one another in spite of ever-possible sorrow, ever-possible joy.

This post originally appeared at Life Journeys To A T

Rating 3.00 out of 5
Tagged with:
 

It seems the United States may slowly be turning around in its attitudes about gay and lesbian acceptance. Polls and popular media are all shifting to a more Gay/Lesbian friendly attitude, one that has the “religious” right wing homo haters rushing towards their fainting couches. Of course, the rhetoric from that group of propagandists has become more and more strident as their mendacious veneer of respectability wears thin and their obvious animosity becomes more and more apparent. They are getting more and more desperate, it seems, as their cash cow begins to run dry.

Some weeks ago, Peter Labarbera, from the “Americans for Truth about Homosexuality” hit upon a new scheme to separate his followers from their cash. He introduced an “Americans For Truth Academy” that, for a fee of course, would teach adults and kids as young as 14 how to engage in his brand of bigotry.

“Adults: $149 for 3-day conference; Single day rate: $50/day; Married couples discount: $199 for full conference; Youth: $99 (scholarships available to attendees ages 14-25)”

Two of the scheduled seminars in this laff fest are:

- Matt Barber, Liberty Counsel; Board Member, AFTAH: “Masculine Christianity: a non-defensive approach to the Culture War over homosexuality”

- Arthur Goldberg, JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality: “The gender confusion agenda: ‘transgender rights’”

First of all, I have to question how and where “masculine Christianity” is defined in the Bible, as opposed to “feminine Christianity.” Isn’t pretty much all of the Bible written by, for and generally about men? Calling his brand of Christianity “masculine” smacks of overcompensation and misogyny, two things that we are all too familiar with as motivations for hate crimes. In addition, what could “non-defensive” mean except “offensive?” The dog whistles are too loud in this workshop advertisement to ignore. I hope and pray the effect of its teaching doesn’t manifest itself into violence.  If, God forbid, violence is perpetrated by someone who has attended this seminar, I certainly hope accountability will be applied to the fullest.

After lunch on the second day, (“Light lunch provided” – for $50 per day they damn well better feed their “students.” I wonder what they will spike the Koolaid with this time?) we have Arthur Goldberg talking about,“The gender confusion agenda: ‘transgender rights.’” I was unfamiliar with Mr. Goldberg and his qualifications regarding his knowledge of trans people. AFTAH doesn’t have any biographical information on him, or any of the other presenters, other than the groups they are part of so I went a’searchin’.

It seems that Mr. Goldberg has little apparent knowledge, education or experience with trans people and their life experiences. The AFTAH website mentions that he’s the founder of JONAH, (Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality) a Jewish ex-gay ministry. It turns out he started this organization in 1999, after finishing his probation. What was he convicted of? Karen Ocamb tells us,

An investigation by Truth Wins Out, an antigay-watching site headed by longtime Religious Right watcher Wayne Besen and the South Florida Gay News revealed that Arthur Goldberg, co-foundeder of Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality (JONAH) and president of Positive Alternatives to Homosexuality (PATH), is also “Abba Dabba Do,” who the investigators say was “the Wall Street criminal mastermind who was convicted in 1987 and went to prison for ”fraud of spectacular scope” that included “bilking poor communities with complicated bond schemes.”

Wayne Besen, at Truth Wins Out tells us a bit more,

Upon completing his parole, Goldberg dropped his conspicuous middle name, Abba, and co-founded Jews Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality (JONAH) in 1999. He is currently the president of Positive Alternatives to Homosexuality (PATH), an umbrella group for “ex-gay” referrals and the Executive Secretary of the notorious National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH). He is also the President of Congregation Mount Sinai, a temple in Jersey City and a Principal for the International Center for Gender Affirming Processes (CGAP). Goldberg is a key ex-gay industry insider and viewed as an architect of its strategy and message machine.

So it seems this guy is qualified to talk about trans people – as long as honesty and real knowledge aren’t required. Was J. Michael Bailey unavailable? At least he can claim to have done some research about trans people, even if it is just on a few that went to the same bars he did. Hmm, must be nice work if ya kin getit!

Peter Labarbera, calls the trans community, “the crazy cousin of the ‘gay’ movement.” I guess he figures we’re so incapacitated we won’t be able to recognize and call him on the brand of crap he’s peddling. A protest is being planned to take place outside the location of this farce on August 4th. We need a sizable part of that protest come from the trans community. More info can be found at this facebook page. I wish I could be there in body as well as in spirit.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
 

I am not Intersex (to my knowledge) but in the matter of basic bio-ethics and human rights these are not complex or difficult issues.

This post is prompted by this article http://www.healthcanal.com/surgery-rehabilitation/9595-Study-recommends-that-parents-physicians-share-decisions-sex-development-disorder-surgery.html but this is not the first time i have spoken on this issue.

It really is astonishingly simple. Children are not property. Property you can do whatever you want with. Children you cannot. You may have rights over property as an extension of yourself, but a child is not property.

A child is a person. A person in a state of effectively temporarily suspended personal responsibility. Like someone in a coma, someone who is drunk, someone otherwise not currently capable of making decisions for themselves you have a responsibility to their well being so that when they sober or wake up or are cured or grow old enough they can make their own choices. Hear that doctors? Parents?

You are obligated to ensure they can make those choices. You are obligated to their needs untill they can make their own choices. You cannot do whatever you want to them. You cannot have sex with the person in the coma, you cannot tattoo the person who is drunk. You cannot impose over them that they be how you would prefer they be or think they should want. If you think Susie would look better blonde you cannot dye her hair while she is sleeping. You aren’t there to impose your choices over them but to maximise their capacity to make choices for themselves and to maximise the choices they can make for themselves.

Those are their choices to make. And it doesn’t matter that they are presently unable to make those choices. You just have to look after them untill they are capable. So that they will be capable. You keep the comatose person fed intravenously, you hold the drunk persons hair out of the way while they vomit and be sure they don’t fall into the toilet and drown, you feed and clothe the child and ensure they get an education allowing them to make informed decisions.

This is really quite simple on a day to day basis. Now at times a decision must be made on behalf of someone who is your responsibility, in such an emergency it’s quite simple still, the decision you must prioritise is the one that maximises the latter choice of the person in your care.

So lets see how that works for childrens genitals. Well clearly you don’t have sex with children for starters.

 But if you are not having sex with your child, as i found myself explaining to one woman during the Australian Human Rights Community Consultation, then your preferance in appearance of a circumcised penis has no bearing. The mother does not know what the preferance in penis appearance of that childs future partners if any will be. It’s not her bussiness.

The child is totally capable when they grow up to decide whether they want to be circumcised or not. They do not need that decision made for them before they are equally able to make their own decisions about being sexually active.

Imagine if a parent wanted their child tattoo’d. What if that child didn’t like that tattoo when they grew up?

A child may obviously come to regret having their body changed to suit the tastes of their parent/s. A choice made for them when they couldn’t decide for themselves and which in an adult is no-one elses choice but their own. So thats wrong.

Even when such body modification is religious or cultural in origin an adult has the right to change religions, to embrace them, to abandon a culture or embrace it. And so a child should not be put through such body-modifications which they later in life may regret was done to them before they can make those choices for themselves. It’s simple and beyond that it’s concrete. Anything else is an abuse of that childs rights. A failure of the parents responsibility to their child as a free decision making autonomous individual. The child can always choose to undergo that ritual circumcision, scarification, tatttooing, or any other cultural or religious practice when they are old enough to do so of their own free will. A child is a person and not property.

And so we come to Intersex Infants. And by now i already have a water-tight case of what is right and what is wrong. That which maximises the childs adult choices = right. That which reduces them = wrong. So where for survivals sake a child needs surgery the minimum required is all that may ethically be done before the child is considered capable of deciding for itself. Thats it. Nothing else is ethical.

Elective surgery on Intersex Infants is not Ethical. It should be imediately banned. Made a serious crime in fact. Circumcision on infants too should be illegal, whether on females or males, and for the exact same reasons.

Your childrens genitals are not your property. A child is a person. And a doctors duties are not to a parents wishes or preferances but to the childs future options. Thats all there is to it.

And when you understand these basic principles it becomes clear that availability of hormone blockers to delay puberty for Transgender children are quite appropriate because that action maximises the childs own choice in exactly the same way that the innaction of not surgically altering an intersex person without their consent also maximises their choices.

So while one is action and the other inaction the very same Human Rights Principle requires of Parents and Doctors a clear course of action.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
 

Reposted from my personal blog, That’s What Ze Said.

There are so many things destructive to the trans community, but the one getting to me worst lately is the idea of the ideal or singular trans experience. By this, I mean the idea that there is one way to be trans and if you do not fit this model, you are an imposter/going through a phase/just plain not trans. I’ve seen this idea ranging from “you have to know you are trans as a child” to “you must want medical transition.” to whatever else this certain person believes is the litmus test for trans identity. And what really gets me is how much I have seen this internalized within the trans community itself. Sure, lots of cisfolk believe you must have some certain trait to really be trans, but a lot of transfolk believe this too. (more…)

Rating 4.00 out of 5

Wrong tactics? Rhetoric more needed than Reason?

The other day i listened to a radio interview about a study that seems dispiriting but which matches up with my observations of late. http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2010/s2960916.htm

That you can put totally perfect evidence on a platter literally under someone’s very nose and many will still disbelieve it if it doesn’t match what they already believe. Here’s the crux of the matter:

JASON REIFLER: Well we’re certainly susceptible to misinformation in that once we believe something that is wrong then it’s really difficult to correct people.

ELEANOR HALL: So we know that our ignorance about certain issues makes it easy for us to be misled but your research shows that we don’t necessarily change our minds even when we have the facts.

JASON REIFLER: Exactly. And it also shows that there’s an important difference between simply being ignorant and being misinformed, that is, believing that you know something but in fact being wrong.

And what we found is that in trying to correct people there are a number of defences that citizens might be able to bring to bear.

ELEANOR HALL: Your research looked at what you call the back-fire effect in relation to the Iraq War. What did you find?

JASON REIFLER: When we told people that the United States had not found weapons of mass destruction, conservatives, compared to conservatives that we didn’t correct actually believed more strongly that the US had found weapons of mass destruction.

So that by telling them that in fact the US didn’t and pointing to a CIA report known as the Duelfer report citizens actually, their response was, well actually now I believe it more strongly.

ELEANOR HALL: So not only did they not believe the facts that you were putting before them; they actually reinforced the incorrect views they originally had.

JASON REIFLER: Exactly.

ELEANOR HALL: So how do you explain that? Why do people become even more certain in their misperceptions?

JASON REIFLER: When you believe something about the political world or even about the non-political world and it’s really important to you, when you’re told that you’re wrong that can be a pretty threatening experience.

People don’t like being wrong. They have trouble adjusting to it and incorporating new information.

So taking all that in can we still change people’s minds? Why yes, it’s been done before. So it is possible. So what is it we need? What are we doing wrong?

I think the problem is we have been using reasoned, logical nueanced fact-based arguments. Just the sort of thing that reasoned people use to change their views, and i think we’ve won over all of them already. And that’s the problem. We haven’t reached a lot of others because thats not how they change their minds.

We need sound-bites, we need memes, we need emotive arguments, we need rhetoric, we need ways that say why people should support our equal rights that aim right at their most treasured pre-existing values and put their own beliefs into direct conflict with one another and force them to convince themselves.

We need to keep it all backed up with facts still, unlike those who use rhetoric against us, and how potent a tool it has been forthem that despite a mountain of evidence on our side we still get faced with the same empty lies over and over again. And when our Rhetoric is bound together with facts it will be far more potent. And it’s time we bring some Judo into this. Forget the ‘masters tools’ argument, it’s rot. We need to use our opponents own size weight and even momentum against them.

They have been falsely claiming the moral high ground, the religious ground, the family values, the personal liberty.. all of these are the opposite. We have the Ethical and Moral high ground, we have the religious liberty argument that is consistent, we have the care for families, we are the ones calling for personal liberty.

It’s time we put the art into our arguments. And speak to the heart of confused people. Show how our claims more closely match their deep-seated beliefs. And our opponents will cruble like ash before the wind when they realise they cannot keep up fighting with well-told lies when we can fight back with well-told truth.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
 

TransActive II: Expectations

I’m sometimes asked how people can advocate for the trans community, usually by apprehensive people who have visions of standing out in front of government buildings with picket signs shouting slogans, or sometimes by people who are whipping themselves up into an energetic frenzy so that they can be as boisterous as possible.  The truth is that that’s only one form of activism (a kind of last resort, really), and the larger picture is, well, more mundane.  That is not to say it’s easier, it can be very complex at times, but in the end it’s… well… a different kind of drama.

I want to be clear that I’m not wanting to push the Mercedes way of doing things, nor to make myself out to be a guru of some sort.  What I say here needs to be tempered with what your own experience and instincts tell you.  Readers’ experience levels will vary, but I discovered that as basic as some of these things seem, sometimes they still do have to be said.  For those starting out or debating about doing advocacy, I’m hoping this will help folks avoid stumbling out of the gate.

One of the first things one needs to do is assess their own expectations.  Most people realize they’re not going to get rich doing trans advocacy.  There are few paid positions anywhere doing this kind of work — most of your efforts will be of a volunteer nature, and you may need to draw from your day-job income to fund some of them.  Chances are, you’ll have (or need) a job and have (or want) a relationship too, so everything will be a balancing act.

(more after the fold)

(more…)

Rating 3.00 out of 5
 

A guilty pleasure?

OK, I admit it. I haunt the transgender and Gay/Lesbian sections of TOPIX and argue with bigots. I sometimes wonder why I do it. It certainly isn’t the nice people there. One of the more recent replies directed toward me:

See…this is what I am talking about. There is nothing other than opinions here. How can one win or lose. I say that you are freaks. And the majority of people in this world agree with me. So as you do in every other aspect of life, lie to yourself and call yourself a winner. In reality you are still messed up. And for the record, I don’t hate you. I just think that you are messed up freaks. You have done nothing to me to make me hate you. I just choose to stay the F*ck away from freaks like you. And keep my kids away from freaks like you. If my kids ever see you and ask me what that is, I’m telling them that you are a freak and escaped from the bearded lady’s exhibit at the circus. Now go find your d*i*l*d*o and sit on it for a while. You’ll feel better about yourself. Oh…and also…keep up with the affirmation….your doing great for a freak.

This particular poster was at first pushing the “deceitful transsexuals” meme but after I addressed his BS and called it what it was he started descending into the name calling and personal attacks. It’s a common trajectory in those forums. Once in a while you get people who sincerely believe the tripe they are presenting but when the truth is presented, and their ignorance, hypocrisy and prejudice are exposed, they start calling people names.

Part of the reason I answer these people is the belief that there are those who read but do not post there. People who might have more open minds than the haters and who need and benefit from the education I, as an educated trans woman, can provide. I’ve had some feedback from other TOPIX posters that this is the case, but it’s not very often I get such and I sometimes wonder if I’m doing any good at all.

But ya know, maybe I’m not being completely honest here. Maybe I do go there because of that kind of people. In TOPIX I get to answer these bigots which is very gratifying because I can’t answer those who I read about in the news. I can’t fight back against the companies who decide I am not good enough to work for them, not because of my qualifications but because of my medical history. I can’t respond to those who would drag a person to court after their beloved was killed in order to steal an inheritance. I have no way to confront the violent criminals who think it’s appropriate to assault or murder someone because of who they are. I can, however, confront their fellow travelers, the people who think the way they do and behave in the same egregious manner.

So, I guess the payoff is that I get to hit back and I view the pleasure I get from this with a smidgen of guilt. Hitting back usually just provokes another attack. Aggressive confrontation almost always creates a defensive reaction – for some people it is such a strong defensive action that they will begin to argue points they don’t really believe in, just to be able to push back.

I think I’ll keep doing it, however, never mind the guilt. It passes the time. If I had a paying job I would certainly not go there as often, or at all for that matter. I have other things to do that I like to do more. I really do feel I’m providing a valid counterpoint to the prejudice and ignorance, however, and believe my guilt will be counterbalanced by the good I imagine I do there.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
 

The government responds to the needs of other equity groups in Australia with a national plan and a funded national NGO peak body, along with a named Minister/Parliamentary Secretary, national advisory group and a funded departmental unit” said Paul Martin, Chair of the National LGBT Health Alliance.  “The LGBTI community has none of this, yet we face higher health risk factors, less access to health services and poorer health outcomes.”

The National LGBT Health Alliance is trying to do something about the terrible state of Australian LGBTI health. 

http://www.lgbthealth.org.au/election2010

With the election between Tony Abbott who infamously said he found Gays threatening and our first Woman Prime Minister and our first openly Athiest Prime Minister who ousted the elected PM Kevin Rudd because of the increasing loss of supporters to the left Minor Party the Greens and then announced policies that were a step a little further towards the right than Kevins and with the Greens increasing popularity likely to give them a balance of power in the Senate and perhaps end the influence of Religious Right party Family First this seems like a good time for reminding our representatives of our needs and our votes.

As it’s fairly safe to say the media will continue it’s customary negligence on this please pass this on to every Australian GLBTI person and ally you know.

Rating 2.00 out of 5
 

Role Models

I was was recently reminded of a conversation I had when ‘coming out’, in which it was suggested that trans folks lack any role models. I couldn’t think of any myself, and I still struggle today. Gay culture is enriched by the likes of Stephen Fry, Ellen Degeneres and Graham Norton; all open about who they are and often successful to boot. Those people peering in on gay culture from the outside can look at such stars (if they so wish) and see positive templates for whatever gay stereotype they may form in their own minds. Those of us looking up to a role model more directly might emulate one example or another, but as a general rule it is those on the outside who seem to change most based on their example.

The closest I think (British) transsexuals come to having such a figure is an archetypical punchline – the ‘middle-aged man in a dress’.

I hopped over to Wikipedia to see whatever vaguely-reliable source it might be for listing transgender people: only Richard O’Brien, Jennifer Finney Boylan, Lauren Harries, Chaz Bono and Calpernia Addams ring any bells:

  • I had no idea that Richard O’Brien even identified as gender-fluid;
  • I only know of Chaz Bono from sensationalised press announcements made a few years ago;
  • I only knew of Calpernia Addams through her YouTube videos until I realised Deep Stealth were involved in the making of Transamerica – her work seems to be entirely trans-focused and not in the mainstream domain;
  • Jennifer Boylan wrote a truly inspirational transgender memoir, but I would not have known about her unless given that book by a friend;
  • and after what Lauren Harries pulled on This Morning I consider her to be an outright embarrassment.

The trouble is, role models are a hard thing to ask for. Just as it is for the gay community, anyone in a position of social power is likely to be quite uncomfortable with ‘coming out’ to the world. Recent news speculation suggests that sport is still quite a homophobic industry, with players being urged to stay closetted in order to avoid damaging their reputations.

Given the violent stigma which still exist for trans people, it’s no surprise that even if we did have a celebrity to look up to, they would not want ‘outing’. Many ordinary folks have strong objections to this too, as stealth (living without disclosure of your previous gender) has a big part to play in many people’s lifestyles – and that should be respected above all else. In short, role models are an excellent thing to have but they must be volunteered – and that takes individual courage.

Why would we need a role model? Such a thing sounds quite shallow, but it is my belief that role models help those on the outside form (at best) a more accurate impression of those in a minority community, and one would hope at the very least for a more positive one. As things stand, the only prior template my parents have had for transgender people is that utterly cheap, comedic punchline. My own transition will (hopefully) help them realise the truth, but I still have to do this in a world which is largely unaware of transsexualism. To know that someone famous has endured what you have and come out stronger for it is a crutch to you and those closest to you, and it goes a long way towards easing any awkward conversations with people who don’t quite understand.

Rating 2.67 out of 5
 

I’m sometimes asked how people can advocate for the trans community, usually by apprehensive people who have visions of standing out in front of government buildings with picket signs shouting slogans, or sometimes by people who are whipping themselves up into an energetic frenzy so that they can be as boisterous as possible.  The truth is that that’s only one form of activism (a kind of last resort, really), and the larger picture is, well, more mundane.  That is not to say it’s easier, it can be very complex at times, but in the end it’s… well… a different kind of drama.

I will get to a how-to, but want to discuss an important underpinning first, in this part.  This will also be one of the most basic yet invaluable things a person can do to be an advocate, without even having to be an “activist” in any way.  And in typical fashion, I’ll start in the most roundabout way possible, but with a point to it all.

(more after the jump)

(more…)

Rating 3.67 out of 5